Bibliographic citations
Aquino, C., Rodríguez, M. (2015). Comparación de la respuesta estructural de los módulos B y C de la I. E. Julio Ramón Ribeyro considerando y sin considerar la interacción suelo - estructura [Tesis, Universidad Privada del Norte]. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/9431
Aquino, C., Rodríguez, M. Comparación de la respuesta estructural de los módulos B y C de la I. E. Julio Ramón Ribeyro considerando y sin considerar la interacción suelo - estructura [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada del Norte; 2015. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/9431
@misc{renati/526320,
title = "Comparación de la respuesta estructural de los módulos B y C de la I. E. Julio Ramón Ribeyro considerando y sin considerar la interacción suelo - estructura",
author = "Rodríguez Cortez, Mayra Thalía",
publisher = "Universidad Privada del Norte",
year = "2015"
}
ABSTRACT In Cajamarca the interaction soil - structure is not taken into account in the analysis and design of buildings because it is not considered in the Peruvian legislation, in addition to little information on the subject; however it is important to study this effect because the structures should not be isolated from its base foundation because the soil helps to dissipate the energy released by earthquakes. That is why this research is focused on a comparative study of the structural response of the module buildings “B“ and “C“ block of School Julio Ramon Ribeyro considering and not considering the interaction soil - structure. For the development of the research they were considered two dynamic models, the dynamic model of DD Barkan - OA Savinov and the dynamic model of the Russian standard SNIP 2.02.05-87. The two dynamic models developed in this research correspond to various research published by the Ph. D. Castro Villarreal Genner, which reflects their hard work and great scientific contribution to the field of earthquake engineering. Likewise, the two buildings that were studied are the essential category (E.030 NTP, 2006), also having the structural system are reinforced concrete frames and foundation footings is connected. The modeling of both buildings was carried out in the ETABS program in its version 2015, taking into consideration the requirements given in the National Building Regulations. First the seismic analysis (static analysis and dynamic spectral) was performed in both buildings considering recessed base; analysis of the results was taken as periods of vibration, drifts mezzanine and maximum internal forces. Seismic analysis of buildings with ground-based maximum drift of 2.15% for the module “B“ and 2.43% for “C“ module, these drifts not comply with the provisions of the seismic standard E.030 being these buildings were obtained very flexible laterally. OA Savinov and the Russian standard SNIP 2.02.05-87 - With the data obtained from the study of soil mechanics (elasticity modulus, Poisson's ratio and coefficient of ballast), the stiffness coefficients for dynamic models were calculated DD Barkan. Then he proceeded to the analysis of flexible base buildings considering both studied dynamic models; obtaining as a result of vibration periods, drifts mezzanine and maximum internal forces. It should be noted that there is more variation between the results obtained with each of the dynamic models. Finally the results of the analysis of ground based buildings were compared with the results obtained from analysis of buildings flexible base, obtaining the final result that the interaction effect soil - the buildings structure produces better structural always present and when response buildings meet the minimum requirements given in Article 15.1 of the seismic standard E.030.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License