Bibliographic citations
Bocanegra, M., Calvo, L. (2016). Implementación de herramientas de mantenimiento autónomo para incrementar eficiencia y eliminar perdidas en la planta de producción Mondelez [Tesis, Universidad Privada del Norte]. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/10866
Bocanegra, M., Calvo, L. Implementación de herramientas de mantenimiento autónomo para incrementar eficiencia y eliminar perdidas en la planta de producción Mondelez [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada del Norte; 2016. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/10866
@misc{renati/523536,
title = "Implementación de herramientas de mantenimiento autónomo para incrementar eficiencia y eliminar perdidas en la planta de producción Mondelez",
author = "Calvo Vega, Lucio Nicola",
publisher = "Universidad Privada del Norte",
year = "2016"
}
ABSTRACT Mondelez International S.A is a multinational American conglomerate engaged in the confectionery, chocolate, chewing gum, biscuit and powder industries, employing approximately 110,000 people in approximately 165 countries with annual revenues of approximately US $ 35 billion, Is a global snack leader with a wide portfolio of biscuits, chewing gums, sweets, chocolates and powdered drinks. In Peru, it produces and markets more than 40 products, including Oreo, Soda Field, Social Club, Ritz, Trident, Chiclets, Chips Ahoy's, Doña Pepa and Cua Cua. The production plant in Peru by Mondelēz International SA during the years 2012 and 2013 achieved poor results, the main production indicators (Yield and GE) are in negative trend, the company's most affected line is the line of Production n ° 5 which is the most modern line and with greater capacity of the plant in which the most recognized and highest sales product of the company is produced, this line starts operations in October 2012 and during 2013 the results do not Have improved, the line came with a design speed of 21 rpm and during 2012 and 2013 by various factors that could not be solved work at 14 rpm which represents a loss of production capacity of 36% its cumulative results were as follows GE = 58.7% Yield = 89.8 and its product reduction is 8.9%. The objectives of the company are GE = 85% and Yield = 95% and Product Merge 4%. In order to reverse these results, the Company's Global Directors decided to adopt a strategy to effectively manage it, which is to implement the Lean Six Sigma methodology in the company. This system covers TPM, Lean Manufacturing and Equipment High performance. As part of this strategy the production plant will assume the implementation of Autonomous Maintenance which is one of the 8 pillars of the TPM, Autonomous Maintenance has 7 steps of Implementation during the present study we will review the implementation of steps 0, 1, 2 and 3 and analyze the results obtained at the end of the implementation of these steps, this implementation will be carried out in the production line n ° 5 of the company which is the line that worse results to obtained during the periods 2012 and 2013. Prior to the implementation of the Autonomous Maintenance steps, the line implemented the first 3 “S“ of the “S“ ordering and cleaning methodology, which consisted of dislodging, organizing and cleaning the structures and surroundings of the line to facilitate the start Of the initial cleaning or also called Step 0, this step is the one that delimits the objectives for Step 1 of Autonomous Maintenance. The Initial Cleanup counts with the participation of all the administrative area of the plant including the Managers of each area to demonstrate to the personnel of plant the degree of importance and the confidence on the part of the Executives that the Autonomous Maintenance will revert the results of the plant. This activity was carried out in 3 days with a daily work of 8 hours integrating the 3 work shifts and declaring the Production Facilitator as the leader of the autonomous maintenance team of each shift. During the implementation of Step 1, the plant personnel learned and practiced the basics of autonomous maintenance such as the 7 types of Kaizen, Lups, Paros Minor anomalies, and the first CI standard, I also applied Security Tools such as LOTO, ARP, Security Maps, etc. And the first equipment of supports of the line was formed having as leader of the equipment to the Production Facilitator. During Step 1 we also implemented tools such as DMS which is a management system for daily monitoring of indicators, activity board and weekly scheduled stops to perform step activities such as reporting anomalies, LUPs, Kaizen and troubleshooting. During the implementation of Step 2, the personnel of the line focused on eliminating the type 3 and 4 anomalies (Pollution Sources and Difficult Access Areas) of the line, to prioritize which sources to eliminate a prioritization matrix was made taking into account aspects Quality, safety, and impact on production indicators, in this step operators also learn to use tools for analysis and problem solving, such as 5W 1H, Working Principles, Ishikawa Diagram, Pareto Diagram etc. During the implementation of Step 3 the operator begins to increase his technical knowledge by learning everything related to lubrication, Step 3 is the step that begins to give sustainability to the maintainability of the equipment in this step to the CI Standard elaborated in Step 1 is added The lubrication in step 3 also begins to apply the visual controls to facilitate cleaning inspection and lubrication in this step the plant staff begins to learn the concepts of Centerline which is a tool that serves for the standardization of production processes . At the end of the Implementation of Autonomous Maintenance tools, Mondelez International S.A. production line n ° 5 obtained surprising results, increasing its production indicators superlatively Yield increased by 6.07%, the reduction was reduced by 5.07% more Highlight was the result in its main indicator of production the GE which obtained an increase of 25.79%.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.