Bibliographic citations
Chucos, J., Morales, J. (2021). Análisis comparativo técnico económico entre el método de concreto armado y suelo reforzado para la estabilización de taludes verticales en obras de saneamiento para la empresa GEHA E.I.R.L. Lima 2020 [Tesis, Universidad Privada del Norte]. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/27798
Chucos, J., Morales, J. Análisis comparativo técnico económico entre el método de concreto armado y suelo reforzado para la estabilización de taludes verticales en obras de saneamiento para la empresa GEHA E.I.R.L. Lima 2020 [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada del Norte; 2021. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/27798
@misc{renati/523367,
title = "Análisis comparativo técnico económico entre el método de concreto armado y suelo reforzado para la estabilización de taludes verticales en obras de saneamiento para la empresa GEHA E.I.R.L. Lima 2020",
author = "Morales Sotelo, Jairo Milton",
publisher = "Universidad Privada del Norte",
year = "2021"
}
The purpose of this work is to propose a comparative technical-economic analysis between the method of reinforced concrete and reinforced soil for the stabilization of vertical slopes in sanitation works using reinforced soils for the company GEHA EIRL. for analysis the reinforcement of vertical slopes in sanitation works using reinforced soils for the company GEHA EIRL, the conventional methods of stabilization of slopes will be compared with the stabilization methods MacWall and MacForce, also the technical and economic efficiency will be determined and / or differentiated MacWall and MacForce methods compared to the conventional method. As it is a non-experimental and cross-sectional research, it is of a documentary exploratory nature, because at first the study variables have been described, later the degree of influence between the variables has been measured between the optimization of reinforcement of vertical slopes in Sanitation works using reinforced soils, using direct observation as a data collection technique and the control sheet as an instrument. As a conclusion, according to the results, it can be said that the most appropriate method in this work to replace the conventional reinforced concrete retaining wall would be using MacForce stabilization, since it offers the possibility of using high-adhesion polymeric reinforcements, and its characteristics also allow the construction of tall structures capable of supporting high loads, in addition to having the reinforcement for the reinforced concrete panels a minimum breaking strength of 510 N / mm2 and a minimum yield strength of 355 N / mm2, being a little more expensive than the other methods.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License