Bibliographic citations
Espino, L., (2006). Recuento de bacterias aerobias mesofilas totales en canales bovinas mediante el método de hisopado en un camal de Lima Metropolitana [Tesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12672/758
Espino, L., Recuento de bacterias aerobias mesofilas totales en canales bovinas mediante el método de hisopado en un camal de Lima Metropolitana [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; 2006. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12672/758
@misc{renati/476647,
title = "Recuento de bacterias aerobias mesofilas totales en canales bovinas mediante el método de hisopado en un camal de Lima Metropolitana",
author = "Espino Stuard, Lucero Regina",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos",
year = "2006"
}
--- The finality from the exams microbiogical in the slaughterhouses, is gauge the gradation the hygiene from process the slaughtered meat, the principals agents infecctions e intoxication alimentary to arrive a the meat during this process, the present study to develop in an slaughterhouses of Lima metropolitan, betwixt the months of October and November of 2004, to sampling 30 slaughtered meat cattles the hazard, an day for week, in days alternates during 4 weeks, the objetive was to determine the contamination microbiogical of the slaughtered means of the Recount of aerobic bacterias mesophilic Totals before of the conservation in cold, to utilized the method of sampling not destructive from swabs and an medium of culture rapid the Petrifilm, to swabs the successive areas: rump, flank, brisket, neck; 100 cm2 for area, on the establish the legislation actual, the datas the expressing in terms of logaritmos of colonys formings units per cm2 (ufc/cm2), was: 2.69, 2.75, 3.19, 2.23, 2.49, 2.84, 2.42, 3.18, 2.72, 2.44, 2.70, 3.27, 2.92, 2.9, 2.52, 3.08, 2.79, 2.01, 3.10, 4.11, 3.99, 4.39, 1.95, 3.08, 2.97, 3.27, 3.39, 2.59, 3.51, 3.45; middle the this 3.04 Log ufc/cm2 , this results indication a S: 0.568 y un C.V: 18.58 %, correspond an level of 43.3% of acceptability, 53.3% in the area of doubt, and 3.3 % of unacceptable. Key Words: carcass, cattles, contamination, microbiogical, swabs.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License