Bibliographic citations
Rojas, A., Correa, A. (2023). Eficacia y seguridad de la vacuna contra el virus del papiloma humano en la prevención de la Lesión escamosa Intraepitelial de alto grado anal en hombres que tienen sexo con hombres: Revisión sistemática y metanálisis [Tesis, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/671052
Rojas, A., Correa, A. Eficacia y seguridad de la vacuna contra el virus del papiloma humano en la prevención de la Lesión escamosa Intraepitelial de alto grado anal en hombres que tienen sexo con hombres: Revisión sistemática y metanálisis [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/671052
@misc{renati/411606,
title = "Eficacia y seguridad de la vacuna contra el virus del papiloma humano en la prevención de la Lesión escamosa Intraepitelial de alto grado anal en hombres que tienen sexo con hombres: Revisión sistemática y metanálisis",
author = "Correa Zuñiga, Alessandra Fernanda",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
Efficacy and safety of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in the prevention of anal High Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) in men who have sex with men (MSM): Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in the prevention of anal High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion (HSIL) in men who have sex with men (MSM). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included according to the following PICO: population: MSM, Intervention: HPV vaccine; control: placebo and outcomes: incidence of anal HSIL and presence of adverse events. Conference abstracts, editorials, letters to the editor, and studies that did not have a control group were excluded. Four databases were searched up to April 2022. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 for RCTs. It underwent qualitative and quantitative synthesis using inverse variance random-effects model meta-analysis, and the quality of evidence for outcomes was assessed. Results: Two RCTs with a total of 727 participants were included. It was found that in MSM patients, the HPV vaccine does not reduce the risk of anal HSIL compared to the control (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.13-2.36). Likewise, in MSM patients, the HPV vaccine does not present less risk of anal side effects. adverse events compared to control (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.63-1.16). High risk of bias was found for one of the included RCTs. In the GRADE evaluation, very low quality of evidence was found for the outcomes evaluated. Conclusion: The use of the HPV vaccine proved not to be effective for the prevention of anal HSIL and did not show a lower risk of adverse effects compared to placebo in the MSM population. Although the degree of recommendation is inclined not to recommend the vaccine, it is recommended to maintain a wait-and-see attitude, increase the number of RCTs and consider risk factors that may influence the development of anal HSIL. Others: This systematic review had no external funding and was registered in the PROSPERO database with ID CRD42022323247.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License