Bibliographic citations
Cruz, M., Apaza, M. (2023). Derecho a la pensión por invalidez por enfermedad profesional y los requisitos para su obtención [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/670852
Cruz, M., Apaza, M. Derecho a la pensión por invalidez por enfermedad profesional y los requisitos para su obtención [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/670852
@misc{renati/411019,
title = "Derecho a la pensión por invalidez por enfermedad profesional y los requisitos para su obtención",
author = "Apaza Gonzales, Marco Jean Paul",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
This paper investigates Case No. 05134-2022-PA/TC, which deals with the appeal of constitutional grievance resolved by the Constitutional Court (hereinafter, the Constitutional Court). It analyzes the violation of the right to a disability pension due to the inadequate assessment of the requirements to obtain it. By virtue of this, the Constitutional Court established a new binding precedent in this matter, which we will develop in the following. The controversy began with the amparo action filed by Mr. Feliciano Valentín Osores Dávila (hereinafter, Mr. Osores Dávila), who requested his disability pension due to an occupational disease. The appeal was filed against the Oficina de Normalización Previsional (hereinafter, the ONP), and was declared well-founded by the Sixth Civil Court of Huancayo. However, in the second instance, the Superior Court of Junín decided that it was inadmissible. Finally, the TC declared the claim founded and ordered the delivery of the disability pension to the plaintiff, as well as the payment of the accrued pensions, legal interests and procedural costs. This paper contains the development of the case in question, the conceptual bases on the fundamental right to a pension, extracted from bibliographic sources obtained from databases, related jurisprudence, and the corresponding legal analysis. In addition, the establishment of substantial rules for the granting of a life pension for occupational disease will provide legal certainty to citizens who are in similar conditions. The constitutional interpreter was right to recognize the unconstitutional state of affairs in view of the State's omission and the subsequent change of precedent.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License