Bibliographic citations
Juro, A., Reyes, J. (2023). Reforzamiento estructural para una mejor resistencia a cargas sísmicas del edificio Trecca según la norma E030 [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/670156
Juro, A., Reyes, J. Reforzamiento estructural para una mejor resistencia a cargas sísmicas del edificio Trecca según la norma E030 [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/670156
@misc{renati/409504,
title = "Reforzamiento estructural para una mejor resistencia a cargas sísmicas del edificio Trecca según la norma E030",
author = "Reyes Reyes, Jesseell Elizabeth",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
The investigation was carried out with the objective of proposing a reinforcement system for the Trecca tower. The emblematic Peruvian building came to a standstill and remains abandoned due to its design irregularities. It was designed prior to the implementation of the first version of the E030 regulations and was constructed during the various updates to that norm. The research carried out an in-depth analysis of the static and dynamic of the building at two points, the first with the original model and the second with the already reinforced model. These analyses allow to define if they met the permissible limits of distortion, shear force and drift check. The latter having to be less than 1% of the height of the level. As a tool of use, the Etabs 2020 program was used for data analysis and the Revit 2021 program was used for the design of the structure in its current and reinforced version. In the results obtained, it can be observed how the current version of the structure does not comply with the limits established in the norm E030, and that in the distortion of lateral displacements from level 4 to 22 these exceed the 0.007 permissible distortion for reinforced concrete structures, contrary to the reinforced design whose distortion along the entire section does not exceed the admissible limit. Finally, when conducting the drift check, the current model in the X-axis exceeds the 1% limit, reaching 1.68% at the most critical point, contrary to the results of the reinforced model, which at its maximum reaches a 0.52%
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License