Bibliographic citations
Gavancho, P., Samaniego, L. (2023). Análisis comparativo entre el sistema constructivo de paneles aislados estructurales y los sistemas convencionales aplicado en una vivienda social en la provincia de Huancayo, Perú [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/669979
Gavancho, P., Samaniego, L. Análisis comparativo entre el sistema constructivo de paneles aislados estructurales y los sistemas convencionales aplicado en una vivienda social en la provincia de Huancayo, Perú [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/669979
@misc{renati/409321,
title = "Análisis comparativo entre el sistema constructivo de paneles aislados estructurales y los sistemas convencionales aplicado en una vivienda social en la provincia de Huancayo, Perú",
author = "Samaniego Hurtado, Leonardo Enrique",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
The housing deficit is a problem that has increased in recent years due to the lack of housing that provides different families with an adequate quality of life, since many of them do not have the basic services of housing, water and electricity, due to to the effects generated by the appearance of the Niño phenomenon. For this reason, the urgency of social housing proposals that meet the appropriate parameters to provide vulnerable populations with the basic needs that allow them to improve their quality of life is important. In the department of Junín, province of Huancayo, the implementation of the construction system of insulated structural panels is proposed, through the construction of social housing, due to its benefits such as reduction of execution times, costs and improvement of thermal comfort. . . The research to be presented is descriptive in nature through a documentary emphasis on information collection through a sequence of stages. The results obtained through a comparison between the isolated structural panel system and the lightweight interlocking and confined masonry systems demonstrate that of the different types of panels, the most suitable for its physical properties is the MGO panel, and when modeling the three systems construction projects, the construction process and materials of each one are known, which allows us to determine the relationship in time and cost of each proposal. The construction system of MGO panels has been proven to be earthquake-resistant for its application in a single-story single-family home, whose drift value is within what is permissible depending on the location of the project. On the other hand, MGO panels present a 10% budget reduction compared to confined masonry, with an approximate value of S/28,627. Furthermore, according to the schedule, the on-site application of the MGO construction system presents a difference of 11 and 7 days in execution time with respect to confined masonry and light embedding. Likewise, in the evaluation of thermal comfort the three construction systems resulted within the maximum parameters given by the EM.110 standard. This resulted in the Mgo Sip Panel having better thermal transmittance compared to other conventional systems, since the Mgo panel adapts to any type of climate, whether hot or humid.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License