Citas bibligráficas
Pariona, M., Fuyimoto, F. (2023). “Análisis en la retención del impuesto a la renta bajo criterio del percibido en la reinversión de dividendos de los partícipes de los fondos de inversión que administra MGI SAF en el año 2022.“ [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/669929
Pariona, M., Fuyimoto, F. “Análisis en la retención del impuesto a la renta bajo criterio del percibido en la reinversión de dividendos de los partícipes de los fondos de inversión que administra MGI SAF en el año 2022.“ [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/669929
@misc{renati/409024,
title = "“Análisis en la retención del impuesto a la renta bajo criterio del percibido en la reinversión de dividendos de los partícipes de los fondos de inversión que administra MGI SAF en el año 2022.“",
author = "Fuyimoto Portella , Fernando Takeshi",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2023"
}
The main objective of this work is to analyze the criterion of income tax withholding in the reinvestment of dividends of the participants of the investment funds managed by MGI SAF in the year 2022. To achieve this objective, an investigation was carried out exhaustive of the tax regulations that exist in our country, some of these were found in the Income Tax Law, the Regulations of the Income Tax Law and the Tax Code. In addition, interviews were conducted with 3 tax experts as part of the investigation. As part of the development of the problem, 2 possible alternative solutions were proposed, the first is “Carry out tax withholding in each quarter when distributing dividends to participants who reinvest their dividends” and the second is: “Do not carry out the tax withholding until the moment in which the participants who reinvest their dividends redeem their quotas“, after carrying out a comparative analysis based on four important criteria (viability, impact on the organization, costs-expenses, term), the conclusion was reached. conclusion that the first alternative is the most favorable alternative for the company since through it the correct compliance of tax obligations would be carried out, therefore, heavy additional expenses due to fines are avoided, in addition, no additional process would be carried out by the company. company than it already does today.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons