Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Yong, M., (2022). Informe de Sustentación de Expediente STC N° 01064-2013-PA/TC [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/668627
Yong, M., Informe de Sustentación de Expediente STC N° 01064-2013-PA/TC [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/668627
@misc{renati/407111,
title = "Informe de Sustentación de Expediente STC N° 01064-2013-PA/TC",
author = "Yong Flores, Melissa",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2022"
}
Title: Informe de Sustentación de Expediente STC N° 01064-2013-PA/TC
Authors(s): Yong Flores, Melissa
Advisor(s): Rezkalah Accinelli, Eduardo José
Keywords: Arbitraje; Tribunal arbitral; Cosa juzgada; Arbitration; Arbitral tribunal; Recurso de anulación; Arbitration award
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00; https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
Issue Date: 17-Feb-2022
Institution: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)
Abstract: La Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional materia de análisis (STC N° 01064-2013-PA/TC) tiene especial trascendencia para el análisis jurídico, toda vez que aborda la problemática de la cosa juzgada de los laudos arbitrales.
La controversia bajo revisión se suscita debido a la admisión a trámite de 2 demandas de anulación de laudos arbitrales, pese a que estos ya habían quedado firmes y por lo tanto adquirido los efectos de la cosa juzgada arbitral.
En ese sentido, será materia de revisión en el Informe Jurídico si es que se está afectando o no los denominados efectos de la cosa juzgada en el caso de los laudos arbitrales que son objeto de controversia.
The Constitutional Court Judgment subject of analysis (STC No. 01064-2013-PA/TC) has special significance for legal analysis, since it addresses the issue of res judicata of arbitral awards. The controversy under review arises due to the admission for processing of 2 claims for annulment of arbitral awards, despite the fact that these had already become final and therefore acquired the effects of arbitral res judicata. In that, it will be a matter of review in the Legal Report whether or not the so-called effects of res judicata are being displaced in the case of arbitration awards that are the subject of controversy.
The Constitutional Court Judgment subject of analysis (STC No. 01064-2013-PA/TC) has special significance for legal analysis, since it addresses the issue of res judicata of arbitral awards. The controversy under review arises due to the admission for processing of 2 claims for annulment of arbitral awards, despite the fact that these had already become final and therefore acquired the effects of arbitral res judicata. In that, it will be a matter of review in the Legal Report whether or not the so-called effects of res judicata are being displaced in the case of arbitration awards that are the subject of controversy.
Link to repository: http://hdl.handle.net/10757/668627
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC). Facultad de Derecho
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Cantoni Briceño, Rafael Antonio Nicolás; Quiroz Villalobos, Milton Ebert; Godoy Martínez, José Luis
Register date: 12-Sep-2023
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
