Bibliographic citations
Montesinos, E., (2020). La presencia de la desinformación y posverdad en las columnas de opinión: un análisis de las columnas de Aldo Mariátegui y Luis García Miró Elguera en el contexto del segundo proceso de vacancia al expresidente Pedro Pablo Kuczynski [Tesis, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/655053
Montesinos, E., La presencia de la desinformación y posverdad en las columnas de opinión: un análisis de las columnas de Aldo Mariátegui y Luis García Miró Elguera en el contexto del segundo proceso de vacancia al expresidente Pedro Pablo Kuczynski [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/655053
@misc{renati/394226,
title = "La presencia de la desinformación y posverdad en las columnas de opinión: un análisis de las columnas de Aldo Mariátegui y Luis García Miró Elguera en el contexto del segundo proceso de vacancia al expresidente Pedro Pablo Kuczynski",
author = "Montesinos Nolasco, Edwin",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2020"
}
The following research examines some mechanisms that can show the presence of disinformation and post-truth in opinion journalism. To address this issue, it develops an instrument that helps to identify these mechanisms in the content of the opinion columns of Aldo Mariátegui and Luis García, in the newspapers Perú21 and Expreso respectively, that comment on the second impeachment process against former President Pedro Pablo Kuczynski. The period of analysis took place since the process started until one day after President Martín Vizcarra took office. The first chapter explores the origin of post-truth in disinformation, as well as analyzing what elements they share and how they have transferred from one to the other. Likewise, the mechanisms of disinformation and post-truth that are related to opinion journalism are delimited: fallacies such as ad populum, gratuitous affirmation and hasty generalization, as well as name-calling (adjectives of personal disqualification) and reference to fake news. In the second chapter, this research explores the context and state of opinion journalism in Peru. Subsequently, an instrument is developed to review the chosen columns and analyse the findings of this process were discussed. These findings reveal that in the opinion columns that were analyzed, the use of these disinformation and post-truth mechanism, as fallacies and name-calling (adjectives of personal disqualification), replaces the arguments needed to defend their stances.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License