Bibliographic citations
Castilla, F., (2020). Evaluación del manejo terapéutico en estudiantes de pregrado, egresados y docentes en piezas con hipomineralización incisivo-molar (HIM) en una Universidad privada de Lima [Tesis, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/652217
Castilla, F., Evaluación del manejo terapéutico en estudiantes de pregrado, egresados y docentes en piezas con hipomineralización incisivo-molar (HIM) en una Universidad privada de Lima [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/652217
@misc{renati/390624,
title = "Evaluación del manejo terapéutico en estudiantes de pregrado, egresados y docentes en piezas con hipomineralización incisivo-molar (HIM) en una Universidad privada de Lima",
author = "Castilla Pajares, Fiorella del Rosario",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2020"
}
Objective: To evaluate the therapeutic management selected by undergraduate students, graduates and teachers of a private University of Lima in dental pieces with HIM. Materials and methods: In this study worked with 151 participants, being undergraduate students, graduates and teachers between the ages of 20 and 42 of a Private University in Chorrillos, Lima-Peru. A questionnaire was applied which was subdivided into 2 phases: type of material and type of cavitary preparation with 3 cases of HIM with different severity. For the univariate analysis, the descriptive statistics, absolute and relative frequencies were analyzed (P <0.05). Results: In case 1, the treatment most selected by all respondents was “glass ionomer fissure sealants” being undergraduate 31 (68.9%), graduates 37 (47.43%) and teachers 19 (67.86%). In case 2, the most selected treatment was “preformed crown” being undergraduate of 20 (44.45%), graduates of 33 (42.30%) and teachers 15 (53.57%). In case 3, in the first option “Remove only soft and damaged enamel”, it was most chosen by graduates 45 (57.69%). In the second option "Remove more dental substance, but leave the edge of the preparation in hypomineralized enamel" was most chosen by undergraduate 27 (60%). As for the third option, "Remove all the enamel affected with HIM and leave the edge of the preparation in healthy enamel", was most chosen by teachers 7 (25%). It is also observed that if there was a significant difference between the level of training with therapeutic management (p = 0,000). Conclusions: Based on the results found, it is possible to conclude that the treatment for HIM should be chosen according to the individual characteristics of the affected piece, which will determine the type of cavitary preparation or the type of material to be used.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License