Bibliographic citations
Rebaza, E., (2021). Limitaciones para contraer matrimonio de la viuda y divorciada establecidas en el artículo 243, inciso 3, del Código Civil Peruano y el derecho a la igualdad ante la ley [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/7771
Rebaza, E., Limitaciones para contraer matrimonio de la viuda y divorciada establecidas en el artículo 243, inciso 3, del Código Civil Peruano y el derecho a la igualdad ante la ley [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2021. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/7771
@mastersthesis{renati/381992,
title = "Limitaciones para contraer matrimonio de la viuda y divorciada establecidas en el artículo 243, inciso 3, del Código Civil Peruano y el derecho a la igualdad ante la ley",
author = "Rebaza Vargas, Edgar Alfredo",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2021"
}
The thesis we have called "limitations to against marriage of the widow and divorced established in article 243, third paragraph, of the peruvian civil code and the right to equality before the law”, is intended to determine whether the term contained in art. 243, third paragraph, the Civil Code, applied exclusively to the divorced woman collides with the principle of equality that, constitutionally, it is for everyone. In terms of objectives, we proposed, among others: we investigate the discrepancy between the time of the notarial and municipal term divorce with remarriage for divorced; Browse in the same reality Víctor Larco Herrera district the incidence of divorce between the years 2010 - 2013 , and meet emblematic cases where the issue of discriminatory application of article 243, third paragraph; and meet the level of legislation compared the baseline around term conservation Remarriage applicable to divorced women. In this sense, the problem that we have proposed is as follows: HOW DOES THE PERIOD CONTAINED IN ARTICLE 243, THIRD PARAGRAPH, OF THE PERUVIAN CIVIL CODE, AS A LEGAL PROHIBITION FOR REMARRIED, DOES IT VIOLATE WOMEN'S RIGHT TO EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW? Faced with this question, we formulated the following hypothesis: “Since the statutory prohibition contained in article 243, third paragraph, of the Peruvian Civil Code, requires women to abstain from remarriage for a period of ten (10 ) months after the annulment or dissolution of the previous marriage , unless you have given birth or medically proven she is not pregnant , only applies to divorced women , which does not happen with the man who can do it immediately, explicitly violating the constitutional right to equality that applies to every human person. In application of the logical and legal methods, such as deductive, inductive, interpretive, among others, we have come to the following conclusion of the period contained in article 243, third paragraph, Peruvian Civil Code openly violates the right to equality in the case of divorced women, while the forces exclusively, unlike the male, to observe the period of 10 months to remarry after divorce. Finally, the reasons which led the legislature to enact the 10 months exclusively for divorced women correspond to a reality of the last century very different from this new era, especially if new types are arranged divorce, both as municipal attorney, and the remarkable scientific progress in the determination of paternity and filiation.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License