Bibliographic citations
Morales, B., (2020). Evaluación de factibilidad de un prototipo alternativo al Hemovac en el servicio de cirugía del Hospital de la Amistad Perú-Corea Santa Rosa II-2, Piura 2018 [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/6122
Morales, B., Evaluación de factibilidad de un prototipo alternativo al Hemovac en el servicio de cirugía del Hospital de la Amistad Perú-Corea Santa Rosa II-2, Piura 2018 [Tesis]. : Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/6122
@misc{renati/380228,
title = "Evaluación de factibilidad de un prototipo alternativo al Hemovac en el servicio de cirugía del Hospital de la Amistad Perú-Corea Santa Rosa II-2, Piura 2018",
author = "Morales Carrillo, Brigitte Nohelia",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2020"
}
OBJECTIVE. To determine if the use of a vacuum drainage prototype is a feasible alternative method of vacuum drainage in patients of the Surgery service of the Hospital de la Amistad Peru - Korea Santa Rosa II-2, Piura 2016-2019. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Analytical. Prospective Cross. Observational Cases and controls. Patients treated in the Surgery service of the Hospital de la Amistad Peru - Korea Santa Rosa II-2, Piura who have undergone vacuum drainage by one of the two techniques, 2016-2019. RESULTS. We studied 26 patients who used vacuum drainage, the patients who used hemovac were 17 (65.38%), while the patients with prototype vacuum drainage were 9 (34.62%) patients. The most frequent indication of vacuum drain prototype placement was eventration, with 4 patients (44.44%), followed by orthopedic surgeries with 3 patients (33.33%). No significant differences were found for both groups in terms of sociodemographic characteristics, age, sex, medical history and hospital stay. On the other hand, statistically significant differences (p <0.001) were found regarding the volume of drainage reported, giving superiority to the hemovac (32.94 +/- 5.61 ml) compared to the alternative prototype (15.00 +/- 3.54 ml). CONCLUSION. It was determined that the use of a vacuum drainage prototype did not have significant differences with the use of hemovac, therefore it can be considered as a feasible alternative to vacuum drainage in surgery patients.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.