Bibliographic citations
Quispe, J., Tandazo, G. (2021). Marco de trabajo basado en la metodología ONTARGET y LEAN para el proceso de negocio de revisión de tesis de la escuela de posgrado Ingeniería UPAO, año 2020 [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/8025
Quispe, J., Tandazo, G. Marco de trabajo basado en la metodología ONTARGET y LEAN para el proceso de negocio de revisión de tesis de la escuela de posgrado Ingeniería UPAO, año 2020 [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego; 2021. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/8025
@misc{renati/379952,
title = "Marco de trabajo basado en la metodología ONTARGET y LEAN para el proceso de negocio de revisión de tesis de la escuela de posgrado Ingeniería UPAO, año 2020",
author = "Tandazo Ramírez, Gersi Heraldo",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego",
year = "2021"
}
In the graduate school of the Antenor Orrego Private University, in its admission process in March 2018 compared to March 2019, it obtained a growth of 20%, as the level of competitiveness to access a job position is increasingly high; This growth in the percentage of students studying a master's degree led to an increase in the thesis registration, leading to the need for the UPAO graduate school to reduce the evaluation time of the final thesis reports, having as a problem how to manage the thesis review business process of the Graduate School Engineering section of the Antenor Orrego Private University in 2020? This research proposes a framework based on the Ontarget and Lean methodology for the thesis review business process of the UPAO Graduate School of Engineering in 2020; therefore it presents the specific objectives of Investigating and analyzing the ontarget and Lean Methodology, by means of a bibliographic review; Develop the framework based on the Ontarget and Lean methodology; Develop the framework for the Graduate School thesis review business process. The evaluation of the framework proposal based on the ontarget and Lean methodology was carried out through expert judgment, for which first the level of reliability of the experts was validated through the Cronbach's alpha coefficient, obtaining the value of 0.7 Next, the average acceptance in the opinion of experts was determined in the range from 1 to 5, of the questions to each expert; obtaining the average result of 4. To contrast the hypothesis, it will be carried out through the pre-test and post-test method, with the validity of the indicators that operationalize the variables of the hypothesis, obtaining with the non-parametric chi-square tests in the waiting time / activity respectively a p value <0.05 with which the null partial hypothesis is rejected, affirming that there is a significant level of performance in the satisfaction of the waiting time / activity of the review business process thesis
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License