Bibliographic citations
Cépeda, J., (2019). Condiciones necesarias y legales para el desempeño eficaz de la defensoría universitaria en el Perú. Perspectiva de la comunidad universitaria [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/5619
Cépeda, J., Condiciones necesarias y legales para el desempeño eficaz de la defensoría universitaria en el Perú. Perspectiva de la comunidad universitaria [Tesis]. : Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/5619
@phdthesis{renati/377764,
title = "Condiciones necesarias y legales para el desempeño eficaz de la defensoría universitaria en el Perú. Perspectiva de la comunidad universitaria",
author = "Cépeda Ruiz, José Bruno",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2019"
}
Establishing necessary and legal conditions for the normal development of the activities of the Office of University Advocacy (ODU) in Peru may seem like a complicated task. The main reason is that our country recently, four years ago, legally implemented it in the university system. The novelty of its creation, coupled with the imprecision of the regulatory system, allowed each university to establish its own legal environment. This circumstance resulted in a disparity in the work concepts and purposes of the ODU. Therefore, this work seeks to establish and identify what are these necessary and legal conditions that the ODU needs to standardize, throughout the country, in order to achieve balance in the development of its functions. Therefore, interviews with leading university leaders, students and defenders of some universities in Peru were considered in order to establish what these conditions are In this work it was possible to establish that the ODU needs a mode of election that is uniform for the whole system: national, private and corporation. In addition, it was established that the ODU requires to cover its vulnerability through some legal strategies such as the definition of its managerial rank and its protection against intentions to coerce its autonomy and its sense of guarantor of due process within the university system. In this same context, there is a need to legitimize the processes of election of the University Ombudsman and guarantee his immunity for the acts deriving from his activities in defense of the interests of the university community. The work concludes with the assertion that the ODU requires the conduction of an incumbent with the position of University Advocate, the rank of Vice Chancellor, independence and autonomy in the exercise of their functions and immunity from being judged for acts deriving from their activity as a defender.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.