Bibliographic citations
Avalos, B., (2018). El síndrome de alienación parental y el principio-derecho-norma procedimental del interés superior del niño [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/4161
Avalos, B., El síndrome de alienación parental y el principio-derecho-norma procedimental del interés superior del niño [Tesis]. : Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2018. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/4161
@misc{renati/376918,
title = "El síndrome de alienación parental y el principio-derecho-norma procedimental del interés superior del niño",
author = "Avalos Pretell, Bruno Fernando",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2018"
}
The thesis is entitled “Parental alienation syndrome and the procedural principle-law-rule of the best interests of the child”, which has been designed to determine how the variation of exclusive custody, based on parental alienation syndrome, guarantees the best interests of the child. In this sense, the statement of my problem is as follows: In what way will the variation of tenure, justified by the existence of parental alienation syndrome, effectively guarantee the validity of the procedural right-law-principle of the best interests of the child? The hypothesis is as follow: “The variation of cystody, justified by the existence of parental alienation syndrome, wull effectively guarantee the validity of the procedural principle-right-norm of the best interest of the child if it is regulated in the Children and Adolescents Code; theought the relevant psycho-legal measures anda the levels of intensity of parental alienation”. Logical and legal methods were used to analyze the problema; in the former, analytical, deductive, inductive and synthetic methods were used, while dogmatic, hermeneutical and comparative methods were used as legal methods. The techniques used were bibliographic analysis, document analysis and interviews; thus, the instruments used were bibliographic records, the document analysis guide and the interview guide. The most striking results were the fact that all the interviewees were of the opinion that the behaviour of the cohabiting parent is a reason for varying custody in favour of the alienated father and that the best interests of the child are guaranteed if the levels of intensity of parental alienation are taken into account. The most striking conclusion is that the principle of procedural law and regulation of the best interests of the child will only be guaranteed if the judge takes into account the levels of intensity of parental alienation in order to vary tenancy and if the permitting measure is ordered to restore affective relations between the alienated.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.