Bibliographic citations
Angulo, G., (2016). Licitud en la obtención de voz, imagen u otros medios en el marco del derecho a la intimidad personal a nivel del Código Penal Peruano [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/2261
Angulo, G., Licitud en la obtención de voz, imagen u otros medios en el marco del derecho a la intimidad personal a nivel del Código Penal Peruano [Tesis]. : Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2016. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/2261
@mastersthesis{renati/376451,
title = "Licitud en la obtención de voz, imagen u otros medios en el marco del derecho a la intimidad personal a nivel del Código Penal Peruano",
author = "Angulo Cabrera, Grety Mayeci",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2016"
}
The thesis called ““Legality in obtaining voice, images or other means within the framework of the right to personal privacy level Peruvian Penal Code““, responds to the need to determine the doctrinaire legal basis for the legality of obtaining unauthorized voice, image by any means under the right to privacy in relation to the crime of violation of privacy as defined in Article 154 of the Peruvian Penal Code, and establish the legal effects of the use of voice recording, image for any means, in the form of personal privacy and their relationship with the public interest and their contribution to society. In this sense, the formulation of our problem was: To what extent, exceptionally be lawful obtaining unauthorized recording voice or image by any means, without constituting the crime of violation of privacy typified in Article 154 of the Peruvian Penal Code ?, for which we propose the following hypothesis: to the extent that obtaining unauthorized recording voice or image by any means, are reasonable and public interest, their production is exceptionally tender, without constituting crime of violation of privacy as defined in Article 154 of the Peruvian Penal Code. In this vein, we apply ourselves to the study of the Doctrine, Legislation and Jurisprudence to prove this hypothesis, since, if it is true, involves an intrusion into the private sphere of individuals, however, it is noted that our work justify such interference, as long as the information gained obtained are of public interest and benefit to the community. Thus has been achieved to conclude that the assumptions by which they can justify the legality obtaining unauthorized voice or image by any means, without constituting crime of violation of personal privacy as defined in Article 154 of the Penal Code , they occur when the information gathered is relevant for their contribution to society and manifest public interest.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.