Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Chocano, K., (2016). El dispute boards en los contratos de obra e Infraestructura en la ley Nº30225 [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/1978
Chocano, K., El dispute boards en los contratos de obra e Infraestructura en la ley Nº30225 [Tesis]. : Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2016. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/1978
@misc{renati/376003,
title = "El dispute boards en los contratos de obra e Infraestructura en la ley Nº30225",
author = "Chocano Barrientos, Karla Briggthe",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2016"
}
Title: El dispute boards en los contratos de obra e Infraestructura en la ley Nº30225
Authors(s): Chocano Barrientos, Karla Briggthe
Advisor(s): Quintana Chuquizuta Silvia Magali
Issue Date: 2016
Institution: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO
Abstract: La presente tesis tiene como propósito, demostrar que el Dispute
Boards, como mecanismo alternativo de resolución de controversias,
contribuye en la ejecución de los contratos de obra e infraestructura
dentro del marco de la Nueva Ley de Contrataciones del Estado, en
nuestro país.
Para ello, se han utilizado técnicas como el fichaje, recolección de
información y análisis del contenido; con la finalidad de analizar de
manera precisa la doctrina y legislación correspondiente a la materia de
investigación.
El objetivo de esta investigación es determinar, como este mecanismo
alternativo de resolución de controversias, contribuye en la ejecución de
los contratos de obra e infraestructura dentro del marco de la Nueva Ley
de Contrataciones del Estado, otorgando Celeridad a la solución de
controversias, evitando la paralización de obras en el Perú.
Para esto, se ha recurrido a la Ley N° 30225 y su Reglamento, para
efectos de realizar la interpretación de las normas legales, determinando
de manera precisa las conclusiones y recomendaciones de la
investigación.
Con los resultados obtenidos de la presente investigación, se ha podido
concluir que; la incorporación y regulación del Dispute Boards, como
mecanismo alternativo de resolución de controversias en la Nueva Ley
de Contrataciones del Estado – Ley N° 30225, contribuye
favorablemente en la ejecución de los contratos de obra e
infraestructura, en la medida que garantiza la continuidad de la obra
mientras se resuelven las controversias y desavenencias surgidas.
This research aims to demonstrate that the Dispute Boards, as an alternative mechanism for dispute resolution, contributes to the execution of works contracts and infrastructure within the framework of the new Law on Government Procurement, in our country. To do this, they have used techniques such as signing, data collection and content analysis; in order to analyze accurately the doctrine and corresponding to research legislation. The objective of this research is to determine, as this alternative mechanism for dispute resolution contributes to the execution of works contracts and infrastructure within the framework of the new Law on Government Procurement, giving Celerity to the dispute, avoiding paralyzation of works in Peru. For this, it has resorted to Law No. 30225 and its implementing regulations, for purposes of making the interpretation of legal rules, determining precisely the conclusions and recommendations of the investigation. With the results of this investigation, it has been concluded that; the incorporation and regulation of Dispute Boards, as an alternative mechanism for dispute resolution in the New Law on Government Procurement - Law No. 30225, contributes favorably in the execution of construction contracts and infrastructure, to the extent that guarantees the continuity of the work while disputes and disagreement arising are resolved.
This research aims to demonstrate that the Dispute Boards, as an alternative mechanism for dispute resolution, contributes to the execution of works contracts and infrastructure within the framework of the new Law on Government Procurement, in our country. To do this, they have used techniques such as signing, data collection and content analysis; in order to analyze accurately the doctrine and corresponding to research legislation. The objective of this research is to determine, as this alternative mechanism for dispute resolution contributes to the execution of works contracts and infrastructure within the framework of the new Law on Government Procurement, giving Celerity to the dispute, avoiding paralyzation of works in Peru. For this, it has resorted to Law No. 30225 and its implementing regulations, for purposes of making the interpretation of legal rules, determining precisely the conclusions and recommendations of the investigation. With the results of this investigation, it has been concluded that; the incorporation and regulation of Dispute Boards, as an alternative mechanism for dispute resolution in the New Law on Government Procurement - Law No. 30225, contributes favorably in the execution of construction contracts and infrastructure, to the extent that guarantees the continuity of the work while disputes and disagreement arising are resolved.
Link to repository: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/1978
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas
Grade or title: Abogada
Register date: 20-Oct-2016
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.