Bibliographic citations
Pretell, E., Rebaza, L. (2022). Relación entre los efectos adversos y la continuidad de uso del implante subdérmico en usuarias del Centro de salud Aranjuez – 2019 [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/9688
Pretell, E., Rebaza, L. Relación entre los efectos adversos y la continuidad de uso del implante subdérmico en usuarias del Centro de salud Aranjuez – 2019 [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/9688
@misc{renati/373760,
title = "Relación entre los efectos adversos y la continuidad de uso del implante subdérmico en usuarias del Centro de salud Aranjuez – 2019",
author = "Rebaza Rojas, Loyda Esther",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2022"
}
The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between the adverse effects and the continuity of use of the subdermal implant in users of the Aranjuez Health Center - 2019. It was an ex-post-facto investigation, with a quantitative approach, with a descriptive level of relationship and retrospective non-experimental design; In addition, a data collection form was used to analyze 90 medical records of patients with subdermal implants from the Aranjuez Health Center. The findings showed that 85.6% had acne after using the subdermal implant, 82.2% emotional disturbance, 68.9% breast tension, 62.2% dysmenorrhea, 60% amenorrhea, 56.7% had weight disturbance, 51.1% pain at the site of insertion, 32.2% presented headache and 18.9% bleeding; In addition, 64.4% of the users continued using the subdermal implant, however, the remaining 35.6% opted for its removal. Also, 61.1% of users were young adults between 24 and 35 years old, 32.2% under 24 years old and 6.7% over 35 years old; Regarding the time of use of the implant, 37.8% used it for 6 to 9 months, 33.3% for more than 9 months and 28.9% for less than 6 months. In conclusion, a significant relationship was found between the continued use of the subdermal implant and all the adverse effects evaluated, accepting the alternative research hypothesis (p<0.05).
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License