Bibliographic citations
Arismendiz, P., (2023). El requerimiento de acusación directa y su efecto en el plazo de la prescripción de la acción penal [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/11276
Arismendiz, P., El requerimiento de acusación directa y su efecto en el plazo de la prescripción de la acción penal [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego; 2023. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/11276
@misc{renati/373607,
title = "El requerimiento de acusación directa y su efecto en el plazo de la prescripción de la acción penal",
author = "Arismendiz Lavalle, Priscila de Jesús",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego",
year = "2023"
}
The present investigation touches on one of the problems observed and widely discussed in the system of administration of justice, which we have called ““THE REQUIREMENT OF DIRECT ACCUSATION AND ITS EFFECT ON THE PERIOD OF THE PRESCRIPTION OF CRIMINAL ACTION.““ This issue has been the subject of debate by notorious doctrinaires and justice operators in our midst; the present work focuses on determining which are the legal bases to establish that the accusation requirement does not suspend but rather interrupts the statute of limitations of the criminal action. The methods used in this research obey logical methods, following a deductive, analytical-synthetic analysis, we have also resorted to legal methods in which they allow us to interpret the penal code hermeneutically. At the same time that by means of the doctrinal method we select the positions that adjust to our positions, in this line follows the dialectical method and the method of economic analysis. The results of our investigation are presented as conclusions where we finally state that: The legal grounds to establish that the indictment does not suspend but interrupt the statute of limitations of the criminal action, are: The principle of legality; the correct interpretation of plenary agreement N ° 6-2010 CJ / 116; the scope of plenary agreement No. 1-2010 CJ / 116; the legal nature of the direct accusation; the prohibition of extensive interpretation unfavorable to the defendant; the danger of carrying out an extensive interpretation and the duration of the process with direct accusation.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License