Bibliographic citations
Llauca, L., (2024). Informe sobre Expediente de relevancia jurídica Nº00662-2012-0-1801-JR-CI-42, Indemnización de daños y perjuicios por responsabilidad civil extracontractual por acto de competencia desleal [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27221
Llauca, L., Informe sobre Expediente de relevancia jurídica Nº00662-2012-0-1801-JR-CI-42, Indemnización de daños y perjuicios por responsabilidad civil extracontractual por acto de competencia desleal []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27221
@misc{renati/29256,
title = "Informe sobre Expediente de relevancia jurídica Nº00662-2012-0-1801-JR-CI-42, Indemnización de daños y perjuicios por responsabilidad civil extracontractual por acto de competencia desleal",
author = "Llauca Cueva, Lesly Liz",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
The purpose of this report is to conduct an analysis of Case No. 00662-2012-0- 1801-JR-CI-42, which pertains to the controversial matter of compensation for Extracontractual Civil Liability. In the civil proceeding, at the first instance, the Thirty-First Civil Court dismissed the lawsuit on the grounds that the element of unlawfulness had not been established, as it considered that the defendant's conduct constituted a lawful act of publicity that was a response to the regular exercise of his right to information. In turn, in the appeal process, the Third Civil Chamber decided to overturn the Appellate Judgment, after applying Legislative Decree No. 1044, which approves the Law on Unfair Competition, and determining that the defendant's conduct constituted an act of unfair competition, in the form of acts of undue exploitation of another's reputation, which caused damage to the plaintiff. In this context, this report focuses on analyzing which was the preponderant element of civil liability that led, on the one hand, the Court to dismiss the lawsuit and, on the other hand, the Chamber, to revoke said decision. Likewise, the other concurrent elements of Extracontractual Civil Liability will be analyzed, and their application to the specific case will be examined in order to determine whether we are indeed dealing with a case in which compensation should be granted and the amount of such compensation. Similarly, a normative, doctrinal and jurisprudential analysis will be carried out of the legal concepts involved in the process, such as the right to information, advertising law and the repression of unfair competition.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License