Bibliographic citations
Hurtado, R., Vargas, K. (2012). Errores más frecuentes en la toma y procesado de radiografías Bite Wing en Centro de diagnóstico por imágenes, clínica odontológica, UNAP 2006-2010 [Tesis, Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana]. http://repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12737/2948
Hurtado, R., Vargas, K. Errores más frecuentes en la toma y procesado de radiografías Bite Wing en Centro de diagnóstico por imágenes, clínica odontológica, UNAP 2006-2010 [Tesis]. : Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana; 2012. http://repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12737/2948
@misc{renati/287854,
title = "Errores más frecuentes en la toma y procesado de radiografías Bite Wing en Centro de diagnóstico por imágenes, clínica odontológica, UNAP 2006-2010",
author = "Vargas Paredes, Katius Mily",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional de la Amazonía Peruana",
year = "2012"
}
The overall objective was to determine the most frequent types of errors in the taking and processing ofBite Wing X-rays to patients ofthe Integrated Adult Clinic I and II, served at the Diagnostic Imaging Center of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, UNAP 2006- 2010. The study methodology was: quantitative, non-experimental, not correlated, transverse. The retrospective, descriptive study universe was 1043 and 1232 records bite wing radiographs, the study sample was 279 and 579 records radiographs (244 without errors radiographs and 335 with without radiographs, In summary, we found 444 errors). Observations were made by two observers (RHP. KVP) properly calibrated by a specialist in oral and maxillofacial radiology, (kappa = 0.898). The errors in technique were; Crescent 5.4%, Horizontal Distortion 8.1%. Vertical Distortion 6.7%. Dubbed Movie 0.9% and 18.7% Frame Errors in Processing: Beige 21.6%. 2.5% white spots, scratches and fingerprints 5.6%, digital impression 0.5%. Undefined error: Clear Radiography Dark 24.1% and 6.1% Radioarafia. In all three cases yielded a p < 0.000. In summary, we found 39.6% of errors in the Making Technique. 30.2% of errors in processing errors and 30.2% of horn undefmed. Furthermore, we observed that 57.9% of the rays present a processing error. In conclusion. The most common error was found in the Errors Undefined: radiography clear by 24.1 %, which is statistically significant {p
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.