Bibliographic citations
Inga, R., Vázquez, R. (2018). Conductometría convencional y con localizador apical electrónico en pacientes de la clínica dental de una universidad pública de Loreto, 2017 [Tesis, Universidad de la Amazonía Peruana]. http://repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12737/5509
Inga, R., Vázquez, R. Conductometría convencional y con localizador apical electrónico en pacientes de la clínica dental de una universidad pública de Loreto, 2017 [Tesis]. : Universidad de la Amazonía Peruana; 2018. http://repositorio.unapiquitos.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12737/5509
@misc{renati/279550,
title = "Conductometría convencional y con localizador apical electrónico en pacientes de la clínica dental de una universidad pública de Loreto, 2017",
author = "Vázquez Icomena, Ruben Sanderson",
publisher = "Universidad de la Amazonía Peruana",
year = "2018"
}
The purpose of the present study was to establish the difference between conventional conductometry and electronic apical localizer in patients of the dental clinic of a public university of Loreto 2017. The type of research was quantitative, the design was non-experimental, descriptive, comparative, cross-sectional. The sample consisted of 23 patients who attended the undergraduate dental clinic of the School of Dentistry of the UNAP. The instrument used in the present study was a data collection form that included the informed consent form. The most important results were: 43.3% of the sample did not present differences between both methods of conductometry, 26.7% presented a difference of 1mm; 13.3% of 2mm; 10% of 3mm; 5% of 4mm and 1.7% of 6mm. The 6mm difference only occurred in the male sex; the difference of 4mm was greater in the male sex with 66.7%; that of 1 and 2mm was higher in the female sex with 62.5% and 75% respectively; the coincidence of methods was similar 57.7% male and 42.3 female. The differences between both methods is significant (p = 0.000), which shows that conductometry with electronic apical localizer can not replace conventional conductometry. There is no relationship between the difference in the conductometry of both methods and age. There is no relationship between the difference in the conductometry of both methods and sex. The difference of 6mm only occurred in anterior teeth; the difference of 4mm was greater anterior teeth with 66.7%; the difference of 2mm was greater in molar teeth with 50.0%; the difference of 1mm was greater in anterior teeth with 50.0%; the coincidence of methods was higher in anterior teeth with 61.5%
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License