Bibliographic citations
Mayorga, D., (2023). Análisis del Caso Arbitral N° 2728-2013-CCL: Deficiencias en la motivación del Laudo y las repercusiones al Equilibrio Económico Financiero del Contrato N° 022-2010-GOBIERNO REGIONAL DEL CALLAO, por causas imputables a La Entidad [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25657
Mayorga, D., Análisis del Caso Arbitral N° 2728-2013-CCL: Deficiencias en la motivación del Laudo y las repercusiones al Equilibrio Económico Financiero del Contrato N° 022-2010-GOBIERNO REGIONAL DEL CALLAO, por causas imputables a La Entidad []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25657
@misc{renati/26363,
title = "Análisis del Caso Arbitral N° 2728-2013-CCL: Deficiencias en la motivación del Laudo y las repercusiones al Equilibrio Económico Financiero del Contrato N° 022-2010-GOBIERNO REGIONAL DEL CALLAO, por causas imputables a La Entidad",
author = "Mayorga De La Cuba, David Andrés",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
This paper analyses the controversy between the Regional Government of Callao and the Nueva Gambetta Consortium, which was resolved in arbitration process No. 2728-2013-CCL. The main argument of the Consortium (plaintiff) was based on the fact that, due to the Regional Government of Callao's (defendant) attributable reasons, there were delays in the execution of works, resulting in a modification of the contractual deadline and, therefore, economic consequences under the Contract. As a result, five claims are presented, with the fourth one concerning the payment of Direct Costs that would have been incurred due to the inactivity and/or immobilization of equipment used in the project, as a result of the Entity not delivering the lands where the works would take place, cleared, without interference, and according to the agreed deadline in the Contract. Based on this, the clauses of the Contract, the methodology for calculating Direct Costs, the regulation of this concept in the applicable Contracting Law, as well as subsequent amendments up to the date, are analysed. Likewise, the preservation of the Economic and Financial Equilibrium of the Contract, respect for the Principle of Equity, the modification to the partial delivery of lands, and the chosen contracting system are studied. Finally, the paper concludes that the duty of motivation in the arbitral award is essential to substantiate the decisions made by the Arbitral Tribunal and thereby prevent grounds for annulment of the award
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License