Bibliographic citations
Loayza, A., (2021). Informe recaído en la Resolución Nº 0692-2021-TCE-S1 : análisis de la segunda disposición complementaria modificatoria del Decreto Supremo Nº 168-2020-EF, decreto que modifica el Reglamento de la Ley de Contrataciones del Estado en su artículo 49.6. [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/20082
Loayza, A., Informe recaído en la Resolución Nº 0692-2021-TCE-S1 : análisis de la segunda disposición complementaria modificatoria del Decreto Supremo Nº 168-2020-EF, decreto que modifica el Reglamento de la Ley de Contrataciones del Estado en su artículo 49.6. []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/20082
@misc{renati/25886,
title = "Informe recaído en la Resolución Nº 0692-2021-TCE-S1 : análisis de la segunda disposición complementaria modificatoria del Decreto Supremo Nº 168-2020-EF, decreto que modifica el Reglamento de la Ley de Contrataciones del Estado en su artículo 49.6.",
author = "Loayza Quispe, Andrea Belen",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2021"
}
The objective of this research is to explain what general criterion and method of interpretation would be the ones that best conform to the administrative regulations referring to State contracting, and what is the justification for the insertion of numeral 49.6 in the Regulation of the Law of State contracting, all of this for the purpose of elucidating whether numeral 49.6, incorporated by means of Supreme Decree No. 168- 2020-EF, should be interpreted in such a way that it also applies to simplified awards that derive from Public Tenders and Public Tenders. The method used in the development of this research is the use of various sources of law, such as legislation and doctrine. Thus, we rely on the interpretative criterion of the administrative rules proposed by the lawyer Carlos Balbín, since his proposal is linked to various articles of the Law of General Administrative Procedure. The main conclusions were that, according to the public purpose, the principles of contracting with the State and the rights of the administrated, the benefit directed to small and micro enterprises cannot be used in simplified awards when they derive from other procedures. of selection, since this legal figure exists only for the purpose of quickly concluding the selection procedure, because it has fewer procedural stages, as well as fewer demands and complexities.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License