Bibliographic citations
García, M., Moscoso, D. (2016). Análisis comparativo de la respuesta sísmica de distorsiones de entrepiso - deriva y fuerzas cortantes de una edificación de concreto armado con sistema dual, mediante los análisis sísmico dinámico, aplicado con la norma de diseño sismorresistente E.030 del 2016 y la norma chilena de diseño sísmico de edificios NCh 433.of1996 modificada en 2012. [Tesis, Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/722
García, M., Moscoso, D. Análisis comparativo de la respuesta sísmica de distorsiones de entrepiso - deriva y fuerzas cortantes de una edificación de concreto armado con sistema dual, mediante los análisis sísmico dinámico, aplicado con la norma de diseño sismorresistente E.030 del 2016 y la norma chilena de diseño sísmico de edificios NCh 433.of1996 modificada en 2012. [Tesis]. : Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2016. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/722
@misc{renati/25688,
title = "Análisis comparativo de la respuesta sísmica de distorsiones de entrepiso - deriva y fuerzas cortantes de una edificación de concreto armado con sistema dual, mediante los análisis sísmico dinámico, aplicado con la norma de diseño sismorresistente E.030 del 2016 y la norma chilena de diseño sísmico de edificios NCh 433.of1996 modificada en 2012.",
author = "Moscoso Nieves, Darwin Wilber",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2016"
}
The present research work evaluates the new Peruvian Norm of Design Seismoresistant E.030 in important analysis aspects, having in consideration the modifications and progress that it presents. This one will be compared with the Chilean Norm of Seismic Design of Buildings NCh 433.of1996 modified in 2012, which has been designed to support severe seismic events, presenting rigorous parameters, with which it will be possible to highlight the fortitude and weaknesses opposite to the new Peruvian Norm. In the following chapters knowledge happens to the information that it is necessary to possess to analyze both norms, from the history that the earthquakes imply related to normativity of the engineering Seismoresistant in Peru and Chile up to basic concepts of seismology and structural dynamics, inside every Norm there will be seen the scopes, factors and parameters that intervene in the determination of the bogey of design, as well as the dynamic seismic analysis that both Norms of Design propose. Then there are compared the results of the seismic answer, side displacements, leeway and cutting forces, in which the requirements will be seen that every Norm, going so far as to know if our Peruvian Norm in its modification and progress of its content is projected to be one of the best norms of design Seismoresistant, obtaining this way a perspective of our Peruvian Norm opposite to a Chilean Norm already consolidated and endorsed for the years opposite to severe earthquakes.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License