Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Evaristo, K., (2022). Evaluación productiva del engorde de pollos utilizando comederos manuales y automáticos [Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/5648
Evaristo, K., Evaluación productiva del engorde de pollos utilizando comederos manuales y automáticos []. PE: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/5648
@misc{renati/247047,
title = "Evaluación productiva del engorde de pollos utilizando comederos manuales y automáticos",
author = "Evaristo Broncano, Katyusska",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina",
year = "2022"
}
Title: Evaluación productiva del engorde de pollos utilizando comederos manuales y automáticos
Authors(s): Evaristo Broncano, Katyusska
Advisor(s): Ciriaco Castañeda, Pedro Clemente
Keywords: Pollo de engorde; Pollos de carne; Producción de carne; Raciones; Nutrición animal; Perú; Respuesta productiva
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#4.02.01
Issue Date: 2022
Institution: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina
Abstract: El presente trabajo tuvo como objetivo evaluar los resultados obtenidos en los parámetros productivos en una crianza de pollo de engorde con comederos automáticos versus comederos manuales y así poder determinar con cuál de estos equipos se logran mejores beneficios. Estos parámetros productivos involucran variables como: consumo por ave, pesos semanales, índice de conversión alimenticia (ICA), índice de eficiencia productiva europea (IEP), mortalidad y costos. Para ello, se evaluó durante tres campañas consecutivas dos granjas de pollo de engorde ubicadas en la ciudad de Ica, una con comedero automático y la otra con comedero manual. En ambas granjas se ingresó pollos de la línea Ross, se efectuaron las mismas desinfecciones, se acondicionaron los galpones para brindar un clima adecuado y se suministró el mismo tipo de alimento. El levantamiento de información se llevó a cabo tanto de forma diaria como semanal por veintiséis semanas. Durante este periodo los resultados promedios obtenidos para los comederos automáticos fueron: consumo 4.53 kg/ave, peso 2.890 kg, conversión alimenticia 1.57, índice de eficiencia productiva europea 413, mortalidad 5.01% y en costos S/. 4.36 x Kg. Mientras que, para los comederos manuales se obtuvieron: consumo 4.48 kg/ave, peso 2.736 kg, conversión alimenticia 1.64, índice de eficiencia productiva europea 385, mortalidad 3.46% y S/. 4.67 x Kg en los costos. En base a los resultados obtenidos, se puede concluir que los comederos automáticos son más rentables que los manuales, porque se evidencia una relación directa entre el tipo de equipo utilizado y la performance del ave logrando que en menores días de crianza tenga un mejor peso y por ende menor costo productivo.
The present work had as objective to evaluate the results obtained in the productive parameters in a broiler chicken rearing with automatic feeders versus manual feeders and thus be able to determine with which of these equipment the best benefits are achieved. These productive parameters involve variables such as: consumption per bird, weekly weights, feed conversion ratio (ICA), European productive efficiency index (IEP), mortality and costs. For this, two broiler chicken farms located in the city of Ica, one with an automatic feeder and the other with a manual feeder, were evaluated during three consecutive campaigns. In both farms, Ross line chickens were admitted, the same disinfections were carried out, the sheds were conditioned to provide an adequate climate and the same type of food was supplied. The information gathering was carried out both daily and weekly for twenty-six weeks. During this period, the average results obtained for the automatic feeders were: consumption 4.53 kg/bird, weight 2,890 kg, feed conversion 1.57, European productive efficiency index 413, mortality 5.01% and costs S/. 4.36 x Kg. While, for manual feeders, the following were obtained: consumption 4.48 kg/bird, weight 2,736 kg, feed conversion 1.64, European productive efficiency index 385, mortality 3.46% and S/. 4.67 x Kg in costs. Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that automatic feeders are more profitable than manual ones, because there is a direct relationship between the type of equipment used and the performance of the bird, achieving that in fewer days of rearing it has a better weight and therefore lower production cost.
The present work had as objective to evaluate the results obtained in the productive parameters in a broiler chicken rearing with automatic feeders versus manual feeders and thus be able to determine with which of these equipment the best benefits are achieved. These productive parameters involve variables such as: consumption per bird, weekly weights, feed conversion ratio (ICA), European productive efficiency index (IEP), mortality and costs. For this, two broiler chicken farms located in the city of Ica, one with an automatic feeder and the other with a manual feeder, were evaluated during three consecutive campaigns. In both farms, Ross line chickens were admitted, the same disinfections were carried out, the sheds were conditioned to provide an adequate climate and the same type of food was supplied. The information gathering was carried out both daily and weekly for twenty-six weeks. During this period, the average results obtained for the automatic feeders were: consumption 4.53 kg/bird, weight 2,890 kg, feed conversion 1.57, European productive efficiency index 413, mortality 5.01% and costs S/. 4.36 x Kg. While, for manual feeders, the following were obtained: consumption 4.48 kg/bird, weight 2,736 kg, feed conversion 1.64, European productive efficiency index 385, mortality 3.46% and S/. 4.67 x Kg in costs. Based on the results obtained, it can be concluded that automatic feeders are more profitable than manual ones, because there is a direct relationship between the type of equipment used and the performance of the bird, achieving that in fewer days of rearing it has a better weight and therefore lower production cost.
Link to repository: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/5648
Note: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina. Facultad de Zootecnia. Departamento Académico de Producción Animal
Discipline: Zootecnia
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina. Facultad de Zootecnia
Grade or title: Ingeniero Zootecnista
Juror: Salazar Rodríguez, Ivonne; Cántaro Segura, José Luis; Bernuy Osorio, Nataly
Register date: 15-Feb-2023
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License