Bibliographic citations
Orosco, J., (2022). Análisis comparativo del levantamiento topográfico con drones respecto al método tradicional en proyectos de siembra y cosecha de agua [Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/5673
Orosco, J., Análisis comparativo del levantamiento topográfico con drones respecto al método tradicional en proyectos de siembra y cosecha de agua []. PE: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/5673
@misc{renati/246807,
title = "Análisis comparativo del levantamiento topográfico con drones respecto al método tradicional en proyectos de siembra y cosecha de agua",
author = "Orosco Ambas, Jhonatan Terry",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina",
year = "2022"
}
Planting and Harvesting Water projects (SYCA, 2022) have increased in the country as a measure against the problem of climate change and at the same time to be able to carry out projects that reach high Andean areas. These projects have been carried out by different public entities according to their level of government and private entities such as NGOs and organized communities. Faced with this growing demand for projects, the participation of a large number of professionals who are in charge of carrying out the projects is needed. relevant studies to conclude in a technical file, the topographic study being an essential part of these studies. The present work collects and quantifies the different ways of doing topographic surveys, which constitute different methods, these being carried out with different equipment such as: Total Stations, GNSS-differential geodetic equipment and the use of RPA Remotely Piloted Aircraft or drones, all these forms of surveys. It was carried out in topographic studies of qochas, closure of meadows and micro-reservoirs, which has allowed us to deliver precise topographic information in each case and complying with the minimum standards required by each study. The results allow us to demonstrate that the performance of surveys with RPA-drones in terms of time and confidence are much more efficient in relation to conventional methods, since the number of personnel and field work with RPA-drones are reduced by 50 % compared to conventional topography. All this information together with the comparative analyzes, both visual and quantifying the volume of earth movement and precision of points on the surface, give us very similar results, with the topographic surveys themselves and those carried out with RPA-drones the ones that obtained the best relationship in terms of A comparison of results, this added to the practicality, reliability and yields per surveyed area in sowing and water harvesting projects make it advisable to use RPA-drones as a good method and a good alternative to carry out topographic studies.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License