Bibliographic citations
Ostos, M., (2023). Implementación de estándares de calidad durante el proceso de acreditación para el Programa de Ingeniería Agrícola de la UNALM [Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/6053
Ostos, M., Implementación de estándares de calidad durante el proceso de acreditación para el Programa de Ingeniería Agrícola de la UNALM []. PE: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2023. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/6053
@misc{renati/246343,
title = "Implementación de estándares de calidad durante el proceso de acreditación para el Programa de Ingeniería Agrícola de la UNALM",
author = "Ostos Quiñones, Magaly",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina",
year = "2023"
}
This Professional Sufficiency Work was developed in the Faculty of Agricultural Engineering of the La Molina National Agrarian University, during the period 2018-2019. The main objective was to present the Implementation of Quality Standards of the Accreditation Model for SINEACE University Higher Education Study Programs, with the aim of achieving accreditation for the Agricultural Engineering Study Program before SINEACE. The initial situation of the Program was analyzed against each of the Model standards, encompassed in 04 Dimensions and 12 factors. Based on this, Improvement Plans are designed for the 12 Factors of the Model. The scope of the Implementation covered the Agricultural Engineering Program at the undergraduate level. The methodology of the work consisted of the execution of surveys, interviews and documentary review, design of Plans, formation of Support Commissions and meetings with all levels of organization, both from the University and the Faculty. The process of executing Improvement Plans, as well as the evidence supporting compliance with standards, was consolidated in a Self-Assessment Report, presented to SINEACE at the end of the 2019-I academic cycle. At the beginning of November 2019, the Evaluation Commission made a verification visit to the facilities of the Faculty and university campus, in order to verify what is supported in the Report. He met with the Quality Committee, teaching staff, Support Commissions, graduates and students of the career, as well as university directors. Finally, the Evaluation Commission delivered the Preliminary Report, with the results of the verification visit and analysis of the SelfAssessment Report, where it indicated compliance with 27 accreditation standards, with a rating of Fully Achieved and 07 accreditation standards with a rating of Achieved. The result gave the Faculty the university accreditation for 02 years and the fulfillment of the objective of this Work.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License