Bibliographic citations
Reynaga, W., (2014). Estudio del tratamiento térmico de enlatado de pechuga de pollo (Gallus gallus) en trozos y desmenuzado [Tesis, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/2408
Reynaga, W., Estudio del tratamiento térmico de enlatado de pechuga de pollo (Gallus gallus) en trozos y desmenuzado [Tesis]. : Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2014. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/2408
@misc{renati/245898,
title = "Estudio del tratamiento térmico de enlatado de pechuga de pollo (Gallus gallus) en trozos y desmenuzado",
author = "Reynaga Navarro, Wimar",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina",
year = "2014"
}
Heat treatment of canned chicken was studied in order to find the processing parameters and evaluate the effect of this on the sensory characteristics of products packaged in ½ pound Tuna (307x 109): Chicken Breast Shredded in Brine and Chicken Breast Chunks in Brine. These tests were carried out on the facilities of The Food Pilot Plant of Food Industry Faculty at the National Agrarian University La Molina. The temperature distribution of the autoclave was studied, being the coldest spot at 15 cm from the base of the crate of the autoclave. Then, the coldest point of each product was determined, being in both cases at ¼ height of the container. Heat penetration tests was conducted and determined that the parameters that characterize the canned shredded chicken breast are: fh=8.197 min, f2=27.778 min, jh=1.605, fc=12.987 min, jc=1.335, TA=104.34ºF, TBA=292 774ºF, and canned chicken breast chunks are: fh=14.493 min, jh=1.550, fc=21.739 min, jc=1.581, TA=62.93ºF, TBA=333.448ºF. With the above information, by the method of Stumbo, time processing was calculated, for each temperature, considering a F0 of 8 min as target. Processing times for shredded chicken breast, at temperatures of 230 , 240 and 250 ° F were 115, 41 and 18 minutes respectively, and for the chicken breast chunks, with the above temperatures were 120, 47 and 26 minutes respectively. Using a hedonic scale, relative to overall level of satisfaction, samples treated at temperatures of 230, 240 and 250oF and F0 of 8 min as target were evaluated. From the statistical analysis, it was concluded that no significant difference exists between samples.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License