Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Angeles, S., Hernández, M. (2022). El efecto de los programas de transferencias monetarias sobre el empleo [Universidad del Pacífico]. https://hdl.handle.net/11354/3415
Angeles, S., Hernández, M. El efecto de los programas de transferencias monetarias sobre el empleo []. PE: Universidad del Pacífico; 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/11354/3415
@misc{renati/236648,
title = "El efecto de los programas de transferencias monetarias sobre el empleo",
author = "Hernández Ramos, María Andrea",
publisher = "Universidad del Pacífico",
year = "2022"
}
Title: El efecto de los programas de transferencias monetarias sobre el empleo
OCDE field: http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.02.01
Issue Date: Jan-2022
Institution: Universidad del Pacífico
Abstract: El presente documento busca explicar los mecanismos mediante los cuales los Programas de Transferencias Monetarias Condicionadas (PTMC) impactan en el empleo. Para tal fin, se entiende el impacto en el empleo únicamente por el lado de la oferta laboral (horas de trabajo remunerado y participación laboral). En este sentido, la hipótesis planteada es que estos programas tienen efectos diversos (positivo, negativo o no significativo) sobre la oferta laboral de los adultos beneficiarios. En el marco del modelo tradicional de mercado laboral y la literatura revisada se agrupan los efectos entre (i) aquellos relacionados directamente a la transferencia de dinero y (ii) aquellos relacionados al diseño de los PTMC. El primer grupo considera que, asumiendo que el ocio es un bien normal, por efecto ingreso se reduciría la oferta laboral. El segundo grupo considera que las condiciones del programa generarían una redistribución del tiempo en el hogar que afectaría la oferta laboral positivamente o negativamente; y que algunos criterios de elegibilidad podrían incentivar un incremento en la oferta laboral informal. La evidencia muestra resultados distintos explicados por los mecanismos mencionados. No obstante, también muestra que estos programas pueden no tener efectos significativos cuando el efecto ingreso es pequeño o cuando es contrarrestado por los diferentes mecanismos.
This document seeks to explain the mechanisms through which the Conditional Cash Transfer Programs (CCTP) have an impact on employment. For this purpose, the impact on employment is understood only on the side of the labor supply (hours of paid work and labor participation). In this respect, the hypothesis proposed is that these programs have different effects (positive, negative or not significant) on the labor supply of the adult beneficiaries. Considering the traditional labor market model and the literature reviewed, the effects are grouped into (i) those directly related to the money transfer and (ii) those related to the design of the CCTP. The first group considers that, assuming that leisure is a normal good, the labor supply would be reduced due to the income effect. The second group considers that the conditions of the program would generate a redistribution of time in the households that would affect the labor supply positively or negatively; and that some eligibility criteria could encourage an increase in the informal labor supply. The evidence shows different results explained by the mechanisms already mentioned. However, it also shows that these programs may not have significant effects when the income effect is small or when it is counteracted by the different mechanisms.
This document seeks to explain the mechanisms through which the Conditional Cash Transfer Programs (CCTP) have an impact on employment. For this purpose, the impact on employment is understood only on the side of the labor supply (hours of paid work and labor participation). In this respect, the hypothesis proposed is that these programs have different effects (positive, negative or not significant) on the labor supply of the adult beneficiaries. Considering the traditional labor market model and the literature reviewed, the effects are grouped into (i) those directly related to the money transfer and (ii) those related to the design of the CCTP. The first group considers that, assuming that leisure is a normal good, the labor supply would be reduced due to the income effect. The second group considers that the conditions of the program would generate a redistribution of time in the households that would affect the labor supply positively or negatively; and that some eligibility criteria could encourage an increase in the informal labor supply. The evidence shows different results explained by the mechanisms already mentioned. However, it also shows that these programs may not have significant effects when the income effect is small or when it is counteracted by the different mechanisms.
Link to repository: https://hdl.handle.net/11354/3415
Discipline: Economía
Grade or title grantor: Universidad del Pacífico. Facultad de Economía y Finanzas
Grade or title: Licenciado en Economía
Juror: Castro, Juan Francisco; Galarza, Francisco; Barrón, Manuel
Register date: 24-May-2022
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License