Bibliographic citations
Silva, M., (2022). Resolución N° 8 derivada de la controversia surgida entre Obrascón Huarte Lain S.A. y Provías Nacional [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23082
Silva, M., Resolución N° 8 derivada de la controversia surgida entre Obrascón Huarte Lain S.A. y Provías Nacional []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23082
@misc{renati/23624,
title = "Resolución N° 8 derivada de la controversia surgida entre Obrascón Huarte Lain S.A. y Provías Nacional",
author = "Silva Santisteban Amésquita, Massiel Kenyi",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
This report addresses the interpretation made by the Tribunal of the arbitration between Obrascón Huarte Lain S.A. and Provías Nacional, regarding the requirements for an extension of time under construction contracts. This analysis is important as it shows that the government entity's position could generate perverse incentives to delay the arbitration. Likewise, it addresses the analysis carried out by the Peruvian Superior Court regarding the government entity's claim for annulment, in the sense that the award should have been annulled due to incongruous, apparent and defective motivation. The report concludes, on the one hand, that the requirements for an extension of time must be analyzed considering the opportunity in which they were presented and not the date on which the award is issued; and, on the other hand, that in order to consider that an arbitral award is motivated, a certain extension of the grounds for the decision is not needed. What must be verified is that there is motivation (legal basis); consistency and non-contradiction; and, sufficiency of the motivation, which did occur in the award subject to analysis.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.