Bibliographic citations
Bautista, J., (2023). Informe Jurídico sobre la Resolución N° 5090-2022- SUNARP-TR: Construcción con caudal social en terreno de uno de los cónyuges [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25697
Bautista, J., Informe Jurídico sobre la Resolución N° 5090-2022- SUNARP-TR: Construcción con caudal social en terreno de uno de los cónyuges []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25697
@misc{renati/22439,
title = "Informe Jurídico sobre la Resolución N° 5090-2022- SUNARP-TR: Construcción con caudal social en terreno de uno de los cónyuges",
author = "Bautista Serrano, Jordi Joshua",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
In the present case, through Resolution No. 5090-2022-SUNARP-TR, it continues to be maintained that the community of property is the owner of both the building and the land, the latter being, initially, the property of one of the spouses. In fact, the request of the owner spouse to rectify the registration item of their own property, a parking lot, is denied because the other spouse signed the factory declaration of the parent item, this being a criterion taken by the Registry Court as sufficient reason to consider it as an owner. Consequently, ownership falls on the marital partnership provided that the factory declaration is made during the term of the community of property, in accordance with an interpretation of art. 310 of the Civil Code subject to art. 79 of the Land Registry Registration Regulations. The interpretation of article 310 of the Civil Code is not correct because the Registry Court is being governed based on a regulatory provision in order to apply a norm with the force of law, such as the Civil Code, whose content establishes a reimbursement obligation to favor of the owner spouse and that, unfortunately, it is not required in this Resolution that prefers to take advantage of the Precedent of Mandatory Observance CCXX, instead of advocating for the opening of a special entry on the asset subject of analysis and thus protect the legitimate interests of the titular spouse on the property that, at the beginning, was his own.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License