Bibliographic citations
Jara, K., (2017). La inversión de la carga de la prueba en la Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo N° 29497 en el Proceso Laboral Peruano. [Tesis, Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/1937
Jara, K., La inversión de la carga de la prueba en la Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo N° 29497 en el Proceso Laboral Peruano. [Tesis]. : Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2017. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/1937
@misc{renati/21647,
title = "La inversión de la carga de la prueba en la Nueva Ley Procesal del Trabajo N° 29497 en el Proceso Laboral Peruano.",
author = "Jara Ninalaya, Kelly Antonieta",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2017"
}
Our New Procedural Law of Labor No. 29497 entered into force a few years ago to our country entering with much boom and that brought with it not only the principle of orality, but also very important procedural institutions, which have not been properly attended, we have thus to the burden of proof. We are going to focus our topic directly on what becomes the reversal of the burden of proof and is that starting by mentioning the burden of proof, from now on we will see how it is that the judge not finding conviction about the facts presented by the plaintiff, in this case the worker, takes a position of its jurisdictional power to afloat the reversal of the burden of proof, making the evidentiary burden that the plaintiff had to accredit now passes from the other side making the defendant take charge of what did not correspond to a beginning, that is to say that there is clearly an inversion of the burden of the unbalanced test. But let us take into account that without proper management of the institutions can generate worse consequences than initially wanted to avoid with new legislation as for example that the effective judicial protection is affected.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.