Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Angulo, A., (2023). Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución de Consejo Directivo del OSINERGMIN N° 131-2010-OS/CD [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25565
Angulo, A., Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución de Consejo Directivo del OSINERGMIN N° 131-2010-OS/CD []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25565
@misc{renati/19958,
title = "Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución de Consejo Directivo del OSINERGMIN N° 131-2010-OS/CD",
author = "Angulo Remuzgo, Angélica Mireli",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
Title: Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución de Consejo Directivo del OSINERGMIN N° 131-2010-OS/CD
Authors(s): Angulo Remuzgo, Angélica Mireli
Advisor(s): Villegas Vega, Paul Nicolás
Keywords: Procedimiento administrativo--Perú; Sanciones administrativas--Perú; Derecho administrativo--Perú; Derecho ambiental--Perú
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
Issue Date: 3-Aug-2023
Institution: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract: La Resolución N° 131-2010-OS/CD, analizada en el presente trabajo, pone fin al
procedimiento administrativo sancionador llevado a cabo por el Organismo
Supervisor de la Inversión en Energía y Minería contra la empresa minera
Southern Peru Copper Corporation, por haber incurrido en infracciones a normas
ambientales. Dicho ello, la finalidad del presente trabajo es ofrecer un análisis
crítico sobre la observancia de los principios de legalidad y debido procedimiento,
límites de la potestad sancionadora de la Administración Pública, en el marco de
dicho procedimiento sancionador. Para tal efecto, se recurrirá a la Ley del
Procedimiento Administrativo General, así como también, a la normativa
sectorial, jurisprudencia y doctrina, que permitirán el adecuado y cabal desarrollo
del objetivo propuesto.
En función del análisis realizado, se argumenta que el organismo regulador ha
vulnerado los principios de legalidad y debido procedimiento, al inobservar las
exigencias formales previstas para la imposición de sanciones, y al no respetar
el procedimiento legalmente establecido, afectando de forma irreparable el
derecho de defensa de la empresa minera. De esta manera, se concluye que la
Resolución N° 131-2010-OS/CD debió declarar la nulidad de todo lo actuado, en
lugar de persistir en la imposición de sanciones en manifiesta contravención a
los principios señalados.
Resolution No. 131-2010-OS/CD, analysed in this paper, puts an end to the administrative sanctioning procedure carried out by the Organismo Supervisor de la Inversión en Energía y Minería against the mining company Southern Peru Copper Corporation for having incurred in infractions of environmental norms. That said, the purpose of this paper is to offer a critical analysis of the observance of the principles of legality and due process, limits of the sanctioning power of the Public Administration, within the framework of this sanctioning procedure. For this purpose, the General Administrative Procedure Act will be referred to, as well as sectorial regulations, jurisprudence and doctrine, which will allow for the adequate and full development of the proposed objective. Based on the analysis carried out, it is argued that the regulator has violated the principles of legality and due process by failing to comply with the formal requirements for the imposition of sanctions, and by not respecting the legally established procedure, irreparably affecting the mining company's right of defence. Thus, it is concluded that Resolution No. 131-2010-OS/CD should have declared the nullity of all the proceedings, instead of persisting with the imposition of sanctions in clear contravention of the principles mentioned.
Resolution No. 131-2010-OS/CD, analysed in this paper, puts an end to the administrative sanctioning procedure carried out by the Organismo Supervisor de la Inversión en Energía y Minería against the mining company Southern Peru Copper Corporation for having incurred in infractions of environmental norms. That said, the purpose of this paper is to offer a critical analysis of the observance of the principles of legality and due process, limits of the sanctioning power of the Public Administration, within the framework of this sanctioning procedure. For this purpose, the General Administrative Procedure Act will be referred to, as well as sectorial regulations, jurisprudence and doctrine, which will allow for the adequate and full development of the proposed objective. Based on the analysis carried out, it is argued that the regulator has violated the principles of legality and due process by failing to comply with the formal requirements for the imposition of sanctions, and by not respecting the legally established procedure, irreparably affecting the mining company's right of defence. Thus, it is concluded that Resolution No. 131-2010-OS/CD should have declared the nullity of all the proceedings, instead of persisting with the imposition of sanctions in clear contravention of the principles mentioned.
Link to repository: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25565
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Facultad de Derecho.
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Tassano Velaochaga, Hebert Eduardo; Villegas Vega, Paul Nicolás; Díaz Montalvo, Jorge Armando
Register date: 3-Aug-2023
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License