Bibliographic citations
Noriega, M., (2021). Factores condicionantes para la aplicación de la reserva del fallo condenatorio en el distrito judicial de Iquitos periodo 2014 – 2018 [Tesis, Universidad Científica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14503/1328
Noriega, M., Factores condicionantes para la aplicación de la reserva del fallo condenatorio en el distrito judicial de Iquitos periodo 2014 – 2018 [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Científica del Perú; 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14503/1328
@mastersthesis{renati/192891,
title = "Factores condicionantes para la aplicación de la reserva del fallo condenatorio en el distrito judicial de Iquitos periodo 2014 – 2018",
author = "Noriega Piña, Marco Antonio",
publisher = "Universidad Científica del Perú",
year = "2021"
}
The objective of the research was to evaluate the conditioning factors for the application of the reservation of the conviction in the judicial district of Iquitos, the type of applied research, descriptive explanatory level, nonexperimental design, the population consisting of two sub-populations: magistrates and lawyers from the Judicial District of Iquitos who answered the questionnaire to find out their opinion, using bibliographic, field and statistical techniques and instruments. The results allow us to conclude that the reservation of the conviction, its legal nature is special prevention, as expressed by the magistrates and lawyers with 62.8% and indicate that there is an adequate treatment of the reservation of the conviction in the Penal Code with 53, 1%, The application is not effective in our criminal system, as expressed by magistrates and lawyers with 56.6% and it was applied on the low scale with 55.7% because the measure is not meeting the objectives for which was created and the defense of the lawyer is inadequate with 65.5% and the role of the lawyers should be to apply more efficiently the reserve of the conviction with 85%. The factors that determine the application of the reservation of the conviction is the culture of imprisonment with 61.9% and the ignorance of the objectives, purposes and functions with 15.1% and the factors that took into account to apply was the favorable prognosis of the accused with 61.1%, the discretionary power of the judge with 26.5% and the quantum of the sentence with 12.4%.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License