Bibliographic citations
Escalante, S., (2017). El informe técnico de catastro en el procedimiento registral convertido en barrera burocrática que dificulta la inscripción en el registro de predios de Urubamba. [Tesis, Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/1741
Escalante, S., El informe técnico de catastro en el procedimiento registral convertido en barrera burocrática que dificulta la inscripción en el registro de predios de Urubamba. [Tesis]. : Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2017. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/1741
@misc{renati/18711,
title = "El informe técnico de catastro en el procedimiento registral convertido en barrera burocrática que dificulta la inscripción en el registro de predios de Urubamba.",
author = "Escalante Flores, Saul",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2017"
}
The Peruvian registry system is comprised mainly of urban properties that have been incorporated into the Public Registries through informal property formalization processes, initiatives promoted by Provincial Municipalities or by request of third parties, among other forms of securitization, which are aimed at to give greater economic value to the properties whose possession is executed in a peaceful, continuous and public manner, by means of their entry into the Public Registries. Without prejudice to this, we believe that a good registry system should consider and allow mainly the incorporation of rural properties that due to their extension and technical difficulties in their delimitation and description are in a situation of greater complexity and difficult access to Public Registries. In addition to the technical requirements, the complications in obtaining legal support that is required in the registration of the first domain must be considered, since, in our registry system, the ownership of the property right over the property must necessarily be accredited. registration matter. From the above, it follows that there is a large number of properties that have not had access to the registry and that, consequently, do not participate in traffic under the benefit of registration advertising, which determines that they can not be subject to independence, subdivisions or transfers that may reach the Registry, often including these acts in an alternative way and without third parties can obtain public and truthful information about the property, nor are they fully protected with respect to the charges, liens or attachments that affect the property. The large percentage of registrations in the Real Property Registry of our country prior to the requirement to collect plans, have been made as merit the notarial document, where the area was indicated, perimeter measures, boundaries and other specifications that individualize the farm, data provided by the same interested party or were extracted from previous documents, which did not always reflect the physical reality of the property, while the notary did not verify “in situ“, this event; so that what is entered in the Registry is a true reflection of the notarial document, but not necessarily the physical reality of the property. This fact, as well as those originated in certain processes of supplementary title or acquisitive prescription of domain, followed without having the Registry antecedent, and if they have it does not keep congruence with the physical reality, has generated overlap or duplication of inscriptions.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.