Bibliographic citations
Palacio, M., (2023). Análisis de la funcionalidad de los puentes peatonales de Marcavalle, Independencia, Poroy, 1ro, 2do, 3ro en la av. 28 de Julio y Nogales, San Antonio, Miraflores, control en la Vía de Evitamiento de la ciudad del Cusco y propuesta de solución [Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/6051
Palacio, M., Análisis de la funcionalidad de los puentes peatonales de Marcavalle, Independencia, Poroy, 1ro, 2do, 3ro en la av. 28 de Julio y Nogales, San Antonio, Miraflores, control en la Vía de Evitamiento de la ciudad del Cusco y propuesta de solución []. PE: Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2023. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/6051
@misc{renati/18517,
title = "Análisis de la funcionalidad de los puentes peatonales de Marcavalle, Independencia, Poroy, 1ro, 2do, 3ro en la av. 28 de Julio y Nogales, San Antonio, Miraflores, control en la Vía de Evitamiento de la ciudad del Cusco y propuesta de solución",
author = "Palacio Concha, Marco Artemio",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2023"
}
The present research work determines the functionality of the pedestrian bridges of Marcavalle, Independencia, Poroy, 1 st nd rd , 2 , 3 on av. July 28, Ttio and Nogales, San Antonio, Miraflores, Control on the avoidance road, considering its physical characteristics such as its geometry, frequency of use, traffic lights and provision of fences. The data that was collected in the ten pedestrian bridges, provide us with the physical and geometric characteristics that determine the appropriate or inappropriate use of the road (pedestrian) infrastructure. Likewise, it was concluded that the functionality of the different pedestrian bridges is given by the physical characteristics of then and this is demonstrated by the percentage of use, such as: In the Marcavalle bridge it is used 53 %, Independencia bridge 52 %, in the Poroy bridge 35%, in the bridge located in Ttio they have only 21%, the Los Nogales bridge 23 %, the San Antonio bridge 63%, the Miraflores bridge 17% and the Control bridge 42% of use; This percentage of use is determined by the concurrence of all the groups that use it.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License