Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Guevara, S., (2022). La ruptura de la Unidad de la Responsabilidad Administrativa Disciplinaria en la regulación peruana [Universidad de Lima]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/15850
Guevara, S., La ruptura de la Unidad de la Responsabilidad Administrativa Disciplinaria en la regulación peruana []. PE: Universidad de Lima; 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/15850
@misc{renati/1830997,
title = "La ruptura de la Unidad de la Responsabilidad Administrativa Disciplinaria en la regulación peruana",
author = "Guevara Perez, Silvia Flor",
publisher = "Universidad de Lima",
year = "2022"
}
Title: La ruptura de la Unidad de la Responsabilidad Administrativa Disciplinaria en la regulación peruana
Authors(s): Guevara Perez, Silvia Flor
Advisor(s): Mendoza Antonioli, Dante Javier
Keywords: Administrative responsibility; Legal certainty; Responsabilidad administrativa; Seguridad jurídica
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00
Issue Date: 2022
Institution: Universidad de Lima
Abstract: La presente investigación analiza el desarrollo de la ruptura de la unidad de la responsabilidad administrativa disciplinaria en el ordenamiento jurídico del Perú, enmarcado en el aumento de facultades a la Contraloría General de la República en materia sancionadora. Para ello se realizará un análisis documental jurídico con el fin de demostrar que no habría seguridad jurídica en términos de lo que se pueda decidir respecto de las infracciones cometidas por las personas al servicio del Estado; por cuanto hay dos instituciones con valores y criterios distintos, aplicando las mismas normas a las mismas personas, por los mismos supuestos, dependiendo de quién describa primero la falta. En el primer capítulo, se hará una revisión preliminar de los conceptos vinculados a la responsabilidad administrativa de los funcionarios, como la función pública y la potestad disciplinaria del Estado. En el segundo capítulo, se analizará la evolución de la normatividad en materia de responsabilidad administrativa disciplinaria y el desarrollo de su ruptura, dando cuenta el problema de la dualidad de instancias administrativas para
la resolución de un mismo problema no se materializa con la Ley, sino de una decisión administrativa del TSRA de la CGR, Acuerdo Plenario Nº01-2013-CG/TSRA. Finalmente, en el tercer capítulo, se presentará una serie de reflexiones respecto
de la competencia sancionadora en materia de responsabilidad administrativa funcional de la CGR, justificada en la lucha contra la corrupción y no en una real distinción de la responsabilidad administrativa disciplinaria. Además, en este último capítulo se
presentará una propuesta legislativa que busca canalizar las modificaciones necesarias para recuperar la unidad de la responsabilidad administrativa disciplinaria, acorde a las recomendaciones brindadas por la OCDE.
The investigation hereby analyzes the development of the rupture of the unity of disciplinary administrative responsibility in the juridical ordering in Peru, framed in the increase of faculties of the General Comptroller of the Republic in sanctionary matters. For this we will do a documental juridical analysis with the purpose of demonstrating that there would not be juridical security in terms of what could be decided in regards to any infractions committed by people in service of the State as there are two institutions with values and different criteria that are applying the same rules to the same people by the identical suppositions, depending of whom is describing the offense initially. In the first chapter, we will do a preliminary review of the concepts that are linked to the administrative responsibility of the officials, such as public functions and the disciplinary authority of the State. In the second chapter, we will analyze the evolution of the normativity in regards to the disciplinary administrative responsibility and the development of its rupture, taking into account that the issue of duality of administrative instances for the resolution of one problem is not materialized with the law, but rather with an administrative decision of the TSRA of the CGR, per the Plenary Agreement Nº01-2013-CG/TSRA. Finally, in the last chapter, we will present a series of reflections on the sanctioning competency in matters of functional administrative responsibility of the Comptroller, justified in the anti-corruption movement and not in a real distinction of the administrative disciplinary responsibility. Furthermore, in this last chapter we will present a legislative proposal whose main objective is to channel the necessary modifications that are needed in order to recover the unity of the functional administrative responsibility, in line with the OCDE recommendations.
The investigation hereby analyzes the development of the rupture of the unity of disciplinary administrative responsibility in the juridical ordering in Peru, framed in the increase of faculties of the General Comptroller of the Republic in sanctionary matters. For this we will do a documental juridical analysis with the purpose of demonstrating that there would not be juridical security in terms of what could be decided in regards to any infractions committed by people in service of the State as there are two institutions with values and different criteria that are applying the same rules to the same people by the identical suppositions, depending of whom is describing the offense initially. In the first chapter, we will do a preliminary review of the concepts that are linked to the administrative responsibility of the officials, such as public functions and the disciplinary authority of the State. In the second chapter, we will analyze the evolution of the normativity in regards to the disciplinary administrative responsibility and the development of its rupture, taking into account that the issue of duality of administrative instances for the resolution of one problem is not materialized with the law, but rather with an administrative decision of the TSRA of the CGR, per the Plenary Agreement Nº01-2013-CG/TSRA. Finally, in the last chapter, we will present a series of reflections on the sanctioning competency in matters of functional administrative responsibility of the Comptroller, justified in the anti-corruption movement and not in a real distinction of the administrative disciplinary responsibility. Furthermore, in this last chapter we will present a legislative proposal whose main objective is to channel the necessary modifications that are needed in order to recover the unity of the functional administrative responsibility, in line with the OCDE recommendations.
Link to repository: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/15850
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Universidad de Lima. Facultad de Derecho.
Grade or title: Abogado
Register date: 18-May-2022
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License