Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Dávila, A., (2023). CCXXVII Pleno del Tribunal Registral, Análisis del debate sobre el sistema de apoyos y salvaguardias [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25521
Dávila, A., CCXXVII Pleno del Tribunal Registral, Análisis del debate sobre el sistema de apoyos y salvaguardias []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25521
@misc{renati/17297,
title = "CCXXVII Pleno del Tribunal Registral, Análisis del debate sobre el sistema de apoyos y salvaguardias",
author = "Dávila Alvarez, Alejandra",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
Title: CCXXVII Pleno del Tribunal Registral, Análisis del debate sobre el sistema de apoyos y salvaguardias
Authors(s): Dávila Alvarez, Alejandra
Advisor(s): Espinoza Espinoza, Juan Alejandro
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
Issue Date: 1-Aug-2023
Institution: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract: El presente informe parte del debate mantenido en el CCXXVII Pleno del Tribunal
Registral, teniendo como propósito realizar un análisis comparativo entre la
normativa nacional vigente y la previa al año 2018 respecto de las personas con
discapacidad neurológica severa diagnosticada al nacer; y de otro lado, un
análisis sobre los requerimientos que les son aplicables para la disposición y
afectación de bienes en el Perú en el ámbito patrimonial. El objetivo es
demostrar cómo la figura actual de apoyos y salvaguardias, incluso cuando quien
es designado como apoyo a nivel judicial pueda contar con facultades de
representación, es insuficiente para proteger ciertos derechos de este grupo de
personas, como lo son estos derechos patrimoniales, y por ello surge la
necesidad urgente de poder otorgar representación legal a los apoyos y de
establecer facilidades procesales que permitan que una persona con
discapacidad neurológica severa diagnosticada al nacer cuente con la
posibilidad y asistencia necesaria para disponer y/o afectar sus bienes con el fin
de salvaguardar su bienestar y necesidades específicas. Finalmente, también se
evaluará la razón de ser de la modificación antes mencionada, que deriva del
modelo social de discapacidad, apoyándose de la doctrina nacional e
internacional que resulte pertinente para luego establecer las formalidades para
disponer y afectar bienes en el Perú y las consecuencias y dificultades para este
grupo de personas y su entorno al momento de salvaguardar sus derechos y su
bienestar integral
This paper refers to the debate held in the CCXXVII Plenary of the Registry Court, with the purpose of carrying out a comparative analysis between the current national regulations and those prior to the year 2018 regarding people with severe neurological disabilities diagnosed at birth; and on the other hand, an analysis of the requirements that are applicable to them for the disposition and affectation of assets in Peru in the patrimonial field. The objective is to demonstrate how the current figure of supports and safeguards, even when whoever is designated as support from a judge may have powers of representation, is insufficient to protect certain rights of this group of people, such as these patrimonial rights. For this reason, there is an urgent need to grant legal representation to the supports and to establish procedural facilities that allow a person with a severe neurological disability diagnosed at birth to have the possibility and necessary assistance to dispose of and/or affect their assets in order to safeguard their well-being and specific needs. Finally, the reason for the aforementioned modification, which derives from the social model of disability, will also be evaluated, relying on the national and international relevant doctrine, to later establish the formalities to dispose of and affect assets in Peru and the difficulties and consequences for this group of people and their environment when it comes to safeguarding their rights and their integral well-being
This paper refers to the debate held in the CCXXVII Plenary of the Registry Court, with the purpose of carrying out a comparative analysis between the current national regulations and those prior to the year 2018 regarding people with severe neurological disabilities diagnosed at birth; and on the other hand, an analysis of the requirements that are applicable to them for the disposition and affectation of assets in Peru in the patrimonial field. The objective is to demonstrate how the current figure of supports and safeguards, even when whoever is designated as support from a judge may have powers of representation, is insufficient to protect certain rights of this group of people, such as these patrimonial rights. For this reason, there is an urgent need to grant legal representation to the supports and to establish procedural facilities that allow a person with a severe neurological disability diagnosed at birth to have the possibility and necessary assistance to dispose of and/or affect their assets in order to safeguard their well-being and specific needs. Finally, the reason for the aforementioned modification, which derives from the social model of disability, will also be evaluated, relying on the national and international relevant doctrine, to later establish the formalities to dispose of and affect assets in Peru and the difficulties and consequences for this group of people and their environment when it comes to safeguarding their rights and their integral well-being
Link to repository: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25521
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Facultad de Derecho
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Tarrillo Monteza, Daniel Edward; Becerra Sosaya, Marco
Register date: 1-Aug-2023
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License