Bibliographic citations
Méndez, G., (2021). Informe Jurídico sobre la Casación N.° 991-2016, Lima Sur – Divorcio por Causal de Separación de Hecho [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/20107
Méndez, G., Informe Jurídico sobre la Casación N.° 991-2016, Lima Sur – Divorcio por Causal de Separación de Hecho []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/20107
@misc{renati/17255,
title = "Informe Jurídico sobre la Casación N.° 991-2016, Lima Sur – Divorcio por Causal de Separación de Hecho",
author = "Méndez Bazalar, Gabriel Antonio",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2021"
}
The objective of this legal report is to determine which separation technique the Supreme Court has used in the cassation case, as well as to establish if it can really apply these and finally determine if this was necessary to solve the controversy or could opt for a better alternative , as it could be: constitutional prevalence of the right to defense, making an extensive interpretation of the first and third rules of the Third Plenary Assembly or having done overrulling. To this end, we make use of the norms of our legal system, jurisprudence and specialized doctrine in the institution of the precedent and having analyzed these, we conclude that the Supreme Court has made an implicit distinguishing; However, the court did it in a deficient way, which contributes to the chaos in the way in which civil precedents are being treated in our country and when applying or not applying a Plenary Assembly, greater attention is required in the motivation of these, to avoid uncertainty and provide greater legal security.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License