Bibliographic citations
Gamarra, M., (2024). Informe sobre expediente de relevancia jurídica Nº 01735-2008-PA/TC, E-2308, sobre proceso de amparo interpuesto por Shougang Hierro Perú S. A. A. contra la Municipalidad Provincial de Nazca [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28052
Gamarra, M., Informe sobre expediente de relevancia jurídica Nº 01735-2008-PA/TC, E-2308, sobre proceso de amparo interpuesto por Shougang Hierro Perú S. A. A. contra la Municipalidad Provincial de Nazca []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28052
@misc{renati/17247,
title = "Informe sobre expediente de relevancia jurídica Nº 01735-2008-PA/TC, E-2308, sobre proceso de amparo interpuesto por Shougang Hierro Perú S. A. A. contra la Municipalidad Provincial de Nazca",
author = "Gamarra Tarrillo, Marcelo Jesús",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
This work analyzes the action for the protection of constitutional rights initiated by the mining company Shougang Hierro Perú S.A.A. against a municipal ordinance issued by the Provincial Municipality of Nazca, which approved an Urban Development Plan for the city of San Juan de Marcona. As a result of this instrument, a conflict arises between the company and the local government, related to the development and continuity of mining activities in the district. This stems from the municipal ordinance categorizing the lands granted in the mining concession as "urban" and "urban expansion", while simultaneously instituting particularly restrictive urban regulations pertaining to mining industrial development. The legal issues stemming from this case are scrutinized from two perspectives. Firstly, from an abstract analysis of the constitutionality of the municipal ordinance, in accordance with the constitutional, legal, and regulatory framework governing the competencies of Local Governments, the development of mining activity, and the approval of urban planning instruments. Secondly, from a concrete analysis of the norm's effects on the constitutional rights of the mining company. Consequently, it was determined that the municipal ordinance failed to adhere to the constitutionally, legally, and regulatory established procedure for approving an urban planning instrument. Moreover, its content infringed the constitutional rights to freedom of enterprise, freedom of industry, and the right to property of the plaintiff company.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License