Bibliographic citations
Armacanqui, K., (2024). Estrategia comunitaria del Programa Nacional Aurora: un estudio sobre la participación comunitaria de las «Facilitadoras en Acción» en la prevención de la violencia contra la mujer, implementado por los Centros Emergencia Mujer de los distritos de San Martín de Porres y del Callao [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27696
Armacanqui, K., Estrategia comunitaria del Programa Nacional Aurora: un estudio sobre la participación comunitaria de las «Facilitadoras en Acción» en la prevención de la violencia contra la mujer, implementado por los Centros Emergencia Mujer de los distritos de San Martín de Porres y del Callao []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27696
@mastersthesis{renati/1665288,
title = "Estrategia comunitaria del Programa Nacional Aurora: un estudio sobre la participación comunitaria de las «Facilitadoras en Acción» en la prevención de la violencia contra la mujer, implementado por los Centros Emergencia Mujer de los distritos de San Martín de Porres y del Callao",
author = "Armacanqui Laupa, Karen Yudiht",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
This research aimed to examine the community participation experience of women leaders in the districts of San Martin de Porres (SMP) and Callao. These women come from organizational spaces and voluntarily decided to participate in community intervention with leaders of the social organization "Programa Nacional Aurora" through the "Centros Emergencia Mujer (CEM)." The research is qualitative, as perceptions, opinions, and testimonies were collected from women leaders and stakeholders directly involved in the intervention. The results found are three. The first is the definition of empowerment as a process through which women leaders are strengthened as actors, decide to leave the private sphere, and mobilize to prevent violence in their communities. The second result is the finding of limited articulation between CEMs and local governments. This result is evidenced by the weak interinstitutional response in both districts and the limited attention to the demands of the facilitators during preventive actions. Likewise, in neither case were gender violence prevention policies incorporated into their municipal management instruments. Lastly, two types of recognition exist for the facilitators: social and institutional. The first comes from the vocation of service in accompanying their peers in denouncing acts of violence. The second is institutional recognition by the authorities. In the case of the SMP district, recognition has been an automatic process; the opposite has occurred in Callao, where the authorities have not recognized the facilitators' network as a social organization in preventing violence. Finally, recommendations are presented based on the limitations of women leaders to strengthen community participation in the fight against violence against women.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License