Bibliographic citations
Evangelista, F., (2023). Informe sobre la Sentencia de la Sala de Juicio IX de la Corte Penal Internacional del caso N° ICC-02/04-01/15: Situación en Uganda: Procurador contra Dominic Ongwen del 6 de mayo del 2021 [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/24760
Evangelista, F., Informe sobre la Sentencia de la Sala de Juicio IX de la Corte Penal Internacional del caso N° ICC-02/04-01/15: Situación en Uganda: Procurador contra Dominic Ongwen del 6 de mayo del 2021 []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/24760
@misc{renati/1664933,
title = "Informe sobre la Sentencia de la Sala de Juicio IX de la Corte Penal Internacional del caso N° ICC-02/04-01/15: Situación en Uganda: Procurador contra Dominic Ongwen del 6 de mayo del 2021",
author = "Evangelista Huaynalaya, Francisco de Jesús",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
Summary of the main and secondary issues: The main legal issues are: 1. Does the mechanism used by the ICC to determine the appropriate penalty comply with articles 77 and 78 of the Rome Statute? Is this mechanism effective? Is it proportionate and transparent? 2. Does the decision to exclude the option of life imprisonment and to punish Dominic Ongwen with 25 years of imprisonment comply with articles 77 and 78 of the Rome Statute? Is this mechanism effective? Is it proportionate and transparent? Main normative instruments used: • Sentence ICC from 6 of May 2021 for this case • The Rome Statute • The Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Court. • Verdict ICC from 4 of February 2021 for this case • Appeal Verdict & Sentence from 15 of December 2022 • Jurisprudence of the Court (Bemba et al., Ntaganda, Lubanga). • Decisions rendered by other international criminal tribunals, such as the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda and the one for the Former Yugoslavia. • National Legislation of various States. Candidate's position on these issues Several previous decisions of the Court have already begun to establish the criteria, which are required for choosing the right sentence. However, this is the first time that a Court has weighed such strong mitigating factors as having been a child soldier with such serious crimes against such strong aggravating factors as those indicated in the indictment. This case calls our attention because it will allow us to see the Court’s reasoning to find out a solution to these issues.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.