Bibliographic citations
Ahumada, V., (2022). Políticas de Aseguramiento de la Calidad: un análisis comparativo del procedimiento de licenciamiento universitario en Chile y Perú [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23297
Ahumada, V., Políticas de Aseguramiento de la Calidad: un análisis comparativo del procedimiento de licenciamiento universitario en Chile y Perú []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23297
@mastersthesis{renati/1660226,
title = "Políticas de Aseguramiento de la Calidad: un análisis comparativo del procedimiento de licenciamiento universitario en Chile y Perú",
author = "Ahumada Bastidas, Víctor Raúl",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
In a world in constant transformation, educational institutions in general, and universities in particular, have had to adapt their educational activities to the social, political, economic and technological environment; not only to provide a relevant and quality education, but also to meet the demands of the market or the administrative authority. And in this evolutionary evolution, in the last decades, university higher education has gone through two antagonistic paths: deregulation and privatization, on the one hand, and, on the opposite side, State control and supervision, with very dissimilar consequences each. Therefore, the objective of this research is to analyze comparative university licensing procedures in Chile and Peru. From a qualitative approach and using the documentary research method, two categories of analysis were established. The first comprises the characteristics of the university licensing procedure. The second addresses the consequences of the denial of licensing. For the selection of the information, the documentary analysis technique was used, which has been systematized by means of the matrix instrument that is of vital importance to organize and compare the information collected. Finally, the analysis and discussion of the results permitted to conclude that in both countries licensing is a mandatory process, but with different scopes and characteristics. For example, in the Chilean case it is only applicable to private universities. On the other hand, in Peru it is a mandatory procedure for all universities, from temporary to renewable nature. The duration in Chile can last up to nine years; however, in Peru it has a legal time of 120 business days. Finally, despite the various questions that generated in both countries, licensing plays a transcendental role for the assurance of educational quality that, although it may be perfectible, it is vitally important to leave behind the liberal laissez faire of university educational service; making that this serves as a guarantee for a sustainable human development.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License