Bibliographic citations
Merma, I., (2024). Análisis de la calidad de las resoluciones judiciales en primera y segunda instancia en el delito de peculado en la Corte Superior de Justicia de Cusco 2017-2019 [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/29460
Merma, I., Análisis de la calidad de las resoluciones judiciales en primera y segunda instancia en el delito de peculado en la Corte Superior de Justicia de Cusco 2017-2019 []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/29460
@mastersthesis{renati/1655044,
title = "Análisis de la calidad de las resoluciones judiciales en primera y segunda instancia en el delito de peculado en la Corte Superior de Justicia de Cusco 2017-2019",
author = "Merma Huaman, Iván",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
The present research work, whose title is “Analysis of the quality of judicial resolutions in the first and second instance in the crime of embezzlement in the Superior Court of Justice of Cusco 2017-2019”, has as its general objective: Analyze the quality of the judicial resolutions in the first and second instance in the crime of embezzlement in the Superior Court of Justice of Cusco 2017-2019. The method used corresponds to the qualitative approach, because the aim is to carry out the jurisprudential and doctrinal analysis. This evaluation will be carried out on the sentences issued by the magistrates whose offices were responsible for administering justice in matters of corruption of officials, specifically in the crime of embezzlement. Due to the nature of the research to be carried out, it will necessarily address a casual documentary and legal methodology. From what has been said, we can deduce that the descriptive-explanatory method was used, which will allow us to explain, based on criteria, the argumentative capacity, and also the shortcomings in the drafting of the resolutions issued in relation to the crime of embezzlement. All of this allows us to conclude that the quality, understood from the point of view of the formal criteria or preconditions for good argumentation and the substantial criteria or aspects of the theory of argumentation, of judicial resolutions in the first and second instance in the crime of embezzlement in the Superior Court of Justice of Cusco 2017-2019, is acceptable.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.