Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Menacho, I., (2023). Expediente arbitral seguido entre el Consorcio de Alimentos SAC y el PRONAA [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25610
Menacho, I., Expediente arbitral seguido entre el Consorcio de Alimentos SAC y el PRONAA []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25610
@misc{renati/15309,
title = "Expediente arbitral seguido entre el Consorcio de Alimentos SAC y el PRONAA",
author = "Menacho Zapata, Irene Maité",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
Title: Expediente arbitral seguido entre el Consorcio de Alimentos SAC y el PRONAA
Authors(s): Menacho Zapata, Irene Maité
Advisor(s): Martin Tirado, Richard James
Keywords: Arbitraje (Derecho administrativo)--Perú; Contratos públicos--Jurisprudencia--Perú; Daños y perjuicios--Jurisprudencia-Perú; Indemnización por daños--Jurisprudencia--Perú
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
Issue Date: 4-Aug-2023
Institution: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract: El presente versa sobre una controversia sometida a arbitraje entre el Consorcio de Alimentos SAC
(en adelante, EL CONTRATISTA) y el Programa Nacional de Asistencia Alimentaria (en adelante, LA
ENTIDAD).
La controversia surge cuando uno de los medios de transporte en los que llevaba EL CONTRATISTA
el producto papilla para la entrega a LA ENTIDAD, sufre un accidente y como consecuencia no puede
cumplir con la entrega en el tiempo pactado, se detectan bolsas rotas, con fechas borradas, así como
bolsas sucias con muestras de haberse mojado, etc., y ante una inmovilización del producto en los
almacenes de LA ENTIDAD realizada por la Fiscalía de Prevención del Delito y remitiendo una
muestra a DIGESA para su verificación, ésta da como resultado no apto para el consumo humano,
siendo así que LA ENTIDAD no efectúa el pago correspondiente.
Dado el no pago, EL CONTRATISTA procede a resolver el contrato suscrito con LA ENTIDAD y recurre
a la vía arbitral para reclamar el mismo, aplicando la cláusula arbitral contenida en el suscrito.
En la vía arbitral, EL CONTRATISTA solicita como pretensión que se le pague la factura pendiente, en
segundo lugar, que se reconozca el pago de una indemnización por daños y perjuicios, aspectos que
van a ser analizados en adelante. Asimismo, analizaremos el proceso arbitral, si se cumplió con los
parámetros de éste, las pretensiones que se solicitaron, si fueron correctamente formuladas, así
como la posición del Tribunal Arbitral.
This is about an arbitration dispute between the Consorcio de Alimentos SAC (hereinafter, CORAL SAC) and the National Food Assistance Program (hereinafter, PRONAA). The dilemma arises when one of the means of transport in which the papilla product is transported suffers an accident and cannot comply with the delivery in the agreed time, for which reason THE ENTITY, due to this delay in the second delivery, does not pay the invoice. correspondent. Made before which. THE CONSORTIUM resorts to resolving THE CONTRACT and chooses to go through arbitration, a possibility enabled by the arbitration clause agreed upon by the parties involved. Given this, THE CONSORTIUM not only requests as a claim that the invoice that remains pending be paid, but also requires compensation for damages that will be analyzed in the following pages. Likewise, we will analyze the arbitration process, if it complied with its parameters, the claims that were requested, if they were correctly formulated and I will make an analysis of the position of the Arbitral Tribunal. Not being less important, I will carry out a brief study on the fortuitous event and force majeure applied additionally from Civil Law to Administrative Law, since this is a clear example of what happens every day in the delay and / or dilation of the deliveries of the administrative contracts, sometimes justified and sometimes not.
This is about an arbitration dispute between the Consorcio de Alimentos SAC (hereinafter, CORAL SAC) and the National Food Assistance Program (hereinafter, PRONAA). The dilemma arises when one of the means of transport in which the papilla product is transported suffers an accident and cannot comply with the delivery in the agreed time, for which reason THE ENTITY, due to this delay in the second delivery, does not pay the invoice. correspondent. Made before which. THE CONSORTIUM resorts to resolving THE CONTRACT and chooses to go through arbitration, a possibility enabled by the arbitration clause agreed upon by the parties involved. Given this, THE CONSORTIUM not only requests as a claim that the invoice that remains pending be paid, but also requires compensation for damages that will be analyzed in the following pages. Likewise, we will analyze the arbitration process, if it complied with its parameters, the claims that were requested, if they were correctly formulated and I will make an analysis of the position of the Arbitral Tribunal. Not being less important, I will carry out a brief study on the fortuitous event and force majeure applied additionally from Civil Law to Administrative Law, since this is a clear example of what happens every day in the delay and / or dilation of the deliveries of the administrative contracts, sometimes justified and sometimes not.
Link to repository: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25610
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Facultad de Derecho.
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Zegarra Valdivia, Diego Hernando; Chocano Davis, Christian César; Martin Tirado, Richard James
Register date: 5-Aug-2023
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License