Bibliographic citations
Grau, A., (2022). Informe Jurídico sobre la Resolución S/N que contiene la Sentencia de Casación recaída bajo el Expediente N° 01430-2016-0-5001-SU-CI-01 [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/22904
Grau, A., Informe Jurídico sobre la Resolución S/N que contiene la Sentencia de Casación recaída bajo el Expediente N° 01430-2016-0-5001-SU-CI-01 []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/22904
@misc{renati/14164,
title = "Informe Jurídico sobre la Resolución S/N que contiene la Sentencia de Casación recaída bajo el Expediente N° 01430-2016-0-5001-SU-CI-01",
author = "Grau Castillo, Arturo Saúl",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
The purpose of the present legal report is to offer an analysis of the Cassation Judgment handed down under File No. 01430-2016-0-5001-SU-CI-01, which deals with the cassation appeal filed by defendants José del Carmen Rodríguez Rosas and Doris Victoria Sánchez Rosales against the second degree judgment that confirmed the end referring to the declaration of nullity of the contract dated March 16, 2007 and, based on the adhesion of the plaintiffs, revoked the two extremes regarding the contracts dated April 3 and May 9, 2007, declaring the nullity of these as well. In this sense, the main problem to be solved by means of this report is to approach the objective limits of the figure denominated as adhesion to the appeal and to analyze if the plaintiffs, by means of their interposed adhesion, could appeal the ends that had not been appealed. As a result, secondary problems arise from this main problem, which seek to analyze whether the decision in this cassation sentence violates procedural principles and rights. Succinctly, the conclusions reached - by means of a methodology based on the analysis of doctrinal positions, through the dogmatic and applicable casuistry - are that the adherence to the appeal is not a mere acquittal of grievances and, therefore, the plaintiffs could adhere on non-appealed points; however, that this institution violates the rights of res judicata and preclusion, attempts against procedural equality and against the principle of procedural good faith.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License