Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Tuñoque, V., (2017). El lavado de activos como delito autónomo y la vulneracion del principio de presunción de inocencia [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/3309
Tuñoque, V., El lavado de activos como delito autónomo y la vulneracion del principio de presunción de inocencia [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego; 2017. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/3309
@misc{renati/1350584,
title = "El lavado de activos como delito autónomo y la vulneracion del principio de presunción de inocencia",
author = "Tuñoque Ramirez, Victoria del Rosario",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego",
year = "2017"
}
Title: El lavado de activos como delito autónomo y la vulneracion del principio de presunción de inocencia
Authors(s): Tuñoque Ramirez, Victoria del Rosario
Advisor(s): Espinola Otiniano, Diomedes Hernando
Keywords: Delito autónomo; Principio de presunción
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.00
Issue Date: 2017
Institution: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego
Abstract: En la presente investigación, tenemos por objetivo principal determinar como el Decreto
Legislativo. N° 1106, que modifica la autonomía del delito de Lavado de Activos afecta el
principio de presunción de inocencia.
Siendo así, se partirá teniendo en consideración la importancia mundial que se le da a la
prevención y control de este delito, por lo que diferentes países y organizaciones buscan crear
un modelo adecuado y efectivo.
Ya delimitada la importancia, debemos traer al plano nacional esta figura delictiva y como
está siendo tratada por la política criminal peruana, partiendo del sentido de la tipificación
nacional, la misma que le da la calidad de autónomo, deteniéndonos aquí, ya que este es un
punto controvertido en el sentido que los jueces y grandes doctrinarios aún no se ponen de
acuerdo respecto al delito previo, por lo que existen dos teorías fundamentales, la primera es
la acogida por nuestra normatividad que la de la autonomía a este delito, y la segunda hace
referencia a que se necesita del delito previo (conocer, vincular, determinar) para que se inicie
- sin ninguna vulneración de principios procesales y constitucionales - el proceso por lavado
de activos.
Por lo que, luego de realizar esta investigación concluimos que, la teoría acogida en nuestra
legislación vulnera efectivamente principios constitucionales y procesales, como es el de
presunción de inocencia.
In the present investigation, our main objective is to determine how the Legislative Decree. No. 1106, which modifies the autonomy of the crime of money laundering affects the principle of presumption of innocence. In this way, it will be divided taking into consideration the global importance that is given to the prevention and control of this crime, so that different countries and organizations seek to create an adequate and effective model. Once the importance has been delimited, we must bring to the national level this criminal figure and as it is being treated by the Peruvian criminal policy, starting from the sense of the national typification, the same one that gives the quality of autonomous, stopping us here, since this is a controversial point in the sense that the judges and great doctrinaires still do not agree on the previous offense, so that there are two fundamental theories, the first is the acceptance by our normativity that the one of the autonomy to this crime, and the second refers to the need to know (to know, to link, to determine) to initiate - without any violation of procedural and constitutional principles - the process of money laundering. Therefore, after conducting this research, we conclude that the theory accepted in our legislation effectively violates constitutional and procedural principles, such as presumption of innocence.
In the present investigation, our main objective is to determine how the Legislative Decree. No. 1106, which modifies the autonomy of the crime of money laundering affects the principle of presumption of innocence. In this way, it will be divided taking into consideration the global importance that is given to the prevention and control of this crime, so that different countries and organizations seek to create an adequate and effective model. Once the importance has been delimited, we must bring to the national level this criminal figure and as it is being treated by the Peruvian criminal policy, starting from the sense of the national typification, the same one that gives the quality of autonomous, stopping us here, since this is a controversial point in the sense that the judges and great doctrinaires still do not agree on the previous offense, so that there are two fundamental theories, the first is the acceptance by our normativity that the one of the autonomy to this crime, and the second refers to the need to know (to know, to link, to determine) to initiate - without any violation of procedural and constitutional principles - the process of money laundering. Therefore, after conducting this research, we conclude that the theory accepted in our legislation effectively violates constitutional and procedural principles, such as presumption of innocence.
Link to repository: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/3309
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Politicas
Grade or title: Abogado
Register date: 22-Nov-2017
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License